Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/565/2019 of A HANUMANTHA RAO Vs D SAMBA SHIVA RAO on 30 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE CONTEMPT CASE NO: 565/2019 Between: 1. A HANUMANTHA RAO, S/O. SRI. A . BAJARAO (LATE), AGED 63 YEARS, ASST. COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION AND
APHC010235102019
IN TH
TUESDAY,
TWO
THE HONOURABLE SR
THE HONOURAB
CO
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. A HANUMANTHA YEARS, ASST. C (RTD.), R/O. D RESIDENCY, DOC
1. D SAMBA SHIVA GOVERNMENT (C PRADESH, 4TH B VELAGAPUDI, AMA
2. SRI M M NAYAK, EXCISE, R.S.NO PRASADAMPADU,
3. SRI T SRINIVASA JUNCTION, D.NO.3 VISAKHAPATNAM-
4. SRI M BHASKAR R AND EXCISE, VISA
5. SRI ANINDYA DAS AND E), PENSION E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARC O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVEND BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR G ONTEMPT CASE NO: 565/2019 RAO, S/O. SRI. A. BAJARAO (LAT COMMISSIONER OF PROHIBITION .NO.50-43-38, FLAT NO.3A, RA CTORS COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM AND RAO, IAS., SPECIAL CHIEF SE CT, P AND E, R AND S) STATE BLOCK, GROUND FLOOR, A.P. S ARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-5225 IAS , COMMISSIONER OF PROH 88-2B, SAI VIHAR POULTRY F VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT RAO, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER O 39-16-66/2, NEAR ICICI BANK, MA -530007. RAO, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, AKHAPATNAM-53001 S GUPTA, PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT SECTION (AP STATE), SAIFABAD, DESH
CH DRANATH ROY GEDELA TE), AGED 63 AND EXCISE AMNARAYANA
...PETITIONER CRETARY TO OF ANDHRA SECRETARIAT,
503. HIBITION AND FORM ROAD, -521108. OFFICE, BIRLA ADHAVADARA, PROHIBITION T GENERAL (A HYDERABAD-
CMR,J & GTK,J C.C.No.565 of 2019
500038.
6. SRI BL HANUMANTHA, DIRECTOR OF TREASURES AND ACCOUNTS, IBRAHIMPATNAM, A.P. STATE, VIJAYAWADA-521456.
7. SRI J SHIVA RAM PRASAD, DEPUTY DIRECTOR, DISTRICT TREASURY, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530002.
8. SMT VL SUBHASHINI, ASST. TREASURY OFFICER, SUB TREASURY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM-530013.
9. SRI P LAXMI NARASIMHAM, COMMISSIONER OF ENQUIRIES, ROOM NO 265, 1ST FLOOR, 5TH BLOCK, AP SECRETARIAT OFFICE, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522503. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents under section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for violating the orders of this Hon'ble Court passed by their Lordships HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT and HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, in W.P.No.28201 of 2018, dated 09-08-2018 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. VENKATESHWARLU GUMMADAVELLY Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. G RAJU
CMR,J & GTK,J C.C.No.565 of 2019
The Court made the following: ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the order of the Court has been complied with.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner also, on instructions, concedes that the order of the Court has been complied with.
3. Therefore, recording the aforesaid submissions of both the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, since the order of the Court is complied with, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 31.03.2026 MDP