Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5045/2026 of P BHARGAV Vs THE STATE OF AP on 30 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 5045/2026 Between: 1. P BHARGAV, S/O. P. RAGHU, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 11-31, GANDHI
APHC010085472026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO: 5045/2026
Between:
1. P BHARGAV, S/O. P. RAGHU, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 11-31, GANDHI ROAD, SATYAVEDU VILLAGE, SATYAVEDU MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517588.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
AMARAVATHI. GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT - 517501.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT
- 517501.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, SATYAVEDU, TIRUPATI DISTRICT-517588.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.2 in issuing the impugned proceedings dated 14.10.2025 in suspending the petitioner from service as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural Justice, Articles 14
and 21 Constitution of India, consequently set-aside the same by directing the respondent No. 1 and 2 reinstate the petitioner into service with all consequential benefits and direct the respondents No.1 and 2 to conduct enquiry and take appropriate action against the officers involved in the said office and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to suspend the impugned proceedings dated 14.10.2025 issued by the 2nd respondent and direct the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner into service pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V VINOD K REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous and no further orders are required.
2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:31.03.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
WRIT PETITION NO:5045 of 2026
Dated:31.03.2026
GK