Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/12200/2019 of Gandi Sundara Rao, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 30 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 12200/2019 Between: 1. GANDI SUNDARA RAO, S/O. VENKATESH, AGED'55 YEARS, OCC
APHC010268412019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 12200/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. GANDI SUNDARA RAO, S/O. VENKATESH, AGED'55 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RIO. VEMPADU VILLAGE, MUNDLAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVTI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, MUNDLAMUR MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
4. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ANDHRA PRADESH SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED, MUNDLAMURU, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
5. MUPPALA KOTESWARAO, S/O. MALLAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC RETIRED EMPLOYEE, VEMPADU VILLAGE, MUNDLAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
6. SOMAPALLI SUBBA RAO, , S/O. BUCHAIAH, AGE 65 YEARS, OCC
PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
7. DADDALA ANJAIAH, S/O. NOT KNOWN, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. VEMPADU VILLAGE, MUNDLAMURU MANDAL,
PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
8. ENNURU SATYAM, S/O. BRAHMAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RIO. VEMPADU VILLAGE, MUNDLAMURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
2. Recording the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
Dated: 31.03.2026
KNN
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 12200/2019
Dated: 31.03.2026 KNN