Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6613/2019 of Yellapu Swamy Naidu Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6613/2019 Between: 1. YELLAPU SWAMY NAIDU, S/O. YELLAPU JAGGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74
APHC010152482019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 6613/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. YELLAPU SWAMY NAIDU, S/O. YELLAPU JAGGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, R/O KOTANNAVARAPU VILLAGE, PENDURTHY MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARVATHI
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, AT VISAKHAPATNAM, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
3. THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND SPECIAL DEPUTY COLLECTOR, NH-16, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, .ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, PENDURTHY NLANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the
JS,J W.P.No.6613/2019
respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner dated 10- 12-2014 and 31-10-2017 made to the 3rd and 4th respondents as arbitrary, illegal and contrary to law and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 3007,A of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay all further proceedings in the Land Acquisi-ion of NH-16 at Pendurthy Village to the extent of petitioner's land, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SAI KRISHNA MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS,J W.P.No.6613/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner has not made any application under Section 6A of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 for mutation.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of by directing the petitioner to file an application under Form-6A, Section 6A of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 for mutation, within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
Upon filing such application along with all necessary documents, the respondents shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders by providing a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within three (3) months. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________
JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 31.03.2026
RSD
JS,J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 6613/2019
Dated: 31.03.2026
RSD