Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/4161/2025 of Yarrakula Danaiah, Vs Smt. G. Jayalakshmi on 30 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4161/2025 Between: 1. YARRAKULA DANAIAH,, S/O. ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
APHC010696992025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4161/2025
Between:
1. YARRAKULA DANAIAH,, S/O. ANJANEYULU, AGED ABOUT 54
YEARS, R/O. KONDAPATURU VILLAGE, KAKUMANU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. SMT G JAYALAKSHMI, THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SOCIAL
WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
3. SRI DR A MALLIKARJUNA, THE DIRECTOR, BACKWARD
CLASSES WELFARE DEPARTMENT, 2ND FLOOR, VISHAL
RESIDENCY, TADIGADAPA, KANURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.V
4. SMT A THAMEEM ANSARIYA, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, GUNTUR.
5. SMT K MAYURI, THE DISTRICT BC WELFARE OFFICER, NAGARAMPALEM, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971
praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to take cognizance of the contempt committed by the Contemnors/Respondents herein and punish them with maximum imprisonment under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 r/w Article 215 of the Constitution of India for utter disobedience and disregard shown to the final Order passed by the Hon’ble A.P. High Court dated 19.09.2023 passed W.P. No. 21201 of 2023 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 328 days for filing the above contempt case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVASA RAO NARRA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. U KANAKA RAJU
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 19.09.2023 passed in W.P.No.21201 of 2023.
Sri N.Narendra Babu, learned counsel representing Sri Narra Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the orders of this Court disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case, have been complied with and there remains nothing for adjudication.
Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 31st March, 2026
RKS