Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/24135/2020 of Istam Trinadha Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 24135/2020 Between: 1. ISTAM TRINADHA RAO,, S/O LATE NARASAYYA, AGED ABOUT 56
APHC010362672020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. ISTAM TRINADHA RAO,, S/O LATE NARASAYYA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O.PARADHI VILLAGE, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
2. ISTAM APPALA SWAMY,, S/O LATE APPAYYA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O. PARADHI VILLAGE, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
3. KALISETTI APPALA. NAIDU,, S/O LATE DALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC- CULTIVATION, R/O.PARADHI VILLAGE, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT REP. BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIZIANAGARAM
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PARVATHIPURAM .SUB DIVISION, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
4. THE TAHSILDAR, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
5. THE VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, PARADHI VILLAGE, BOBBILI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
6. THE PARADHI GRAM PANCHAYAT, PARADHI, BOBBIL MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT.
REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY/PERSON-IN-CHARGE
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Tit or direction declaring the action of the respondents No 4 to 6 herein in proposing to construct Rythu Barosa Kendram in the petitioners land to an extent of Ac 0.40 cents out of Ac 11.61 cents .in Sy No. 165 of Paradhi Village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram District without initiating the proceedings under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2 013 (Act No. 30 of 2013) and without issuing notice, without following d ue process of law as illegal, arbitrary, against the principles on natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioners from the possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of A c 0.40 cents out of Ac 11.61 cents in Sy No. 165 of Paradhi Village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram District and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings including construction of Rythu Barosa Kendram in petitioner's land situated in Sy No. 165 to an extent of Ac 0.40 cents out of Ac 11.61 cents of Paradhi Village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram District and dispossessing the petitioners from their land, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. TADDI NAGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
2. Yarraguntla.Koteswara Rao,Standing Counsel For Zilla Praja Parishads,Mandal Praja Parishads and Gra
The Court made the following Order:
Heard Sri Taddi Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioners in the instant Writ Petition is against the action of the respondents in proposing to construct ‘Rythu Barosa Kendram’ in the subject land over an extent of Ac.0.40 cents out of Ac.11.61 cents in Sy.No.165 of Paradhi Village, Bobbili Mandal, Vizianagaram District, belonging to the petitioner.
3. When the matter is taken up for consideration today, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has placed before the Court a copy of instructions from the Tahsildar, dated 25.02.2026 received by him in the case. A perusal of the same would reflect that it has not been proposed by the respondents for construction of the ‘Rythu Barosa Kendram’ in the subject property and as such the question of dispossession of the petitioners from the subject property would not arise. It is further stated that the Government has not taken any decision to interfere with the possession of the petitioners’ subject land. It is also further stated that the subject land is a Poramboke Gramakantam land.
4. Having regard to the same, since the grievance of the petitioner is redressed, no further orders are required to be passed in the Writ Petition.
5. With the above observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 31.03.2026 MSI
Dated: 31.03.2026 MSI