Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/1719/2025 of DANGETI APPALARAJU DIED Vs VEGISETTTY PURUSHOTHAMA RAO DIED on 29 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: 1. DANGETI APPALARAJU DIED, (DIED). 2. DANGETI VEERASWAMY, S/O LATE GURAYYA AGED ABOUT 61 YRS. BUSINESS,

APHC010328862025

IN TH

MONDAY

TWO

THE HONOURA

CIVIL R

Between:

1. DANGETI APPALAR

2. DANGETI VEERAS

YRS. BUSINESS,

533450. KAKINADA

3. DANGETI RAMBAB

CULTIVATION, R/

KAKINADA DISTRIC

1. VEGISETTTY PUR

2. VEGISEETTY

PURUSHOTHAMA

PITHAPURAM-533

3. DANGETI BHAVA

HOUSE WIFE, PIT

4. ACHANTA NAGA

57 YRS. HOUS

DISTRICT.

5. DANGETI VEERA

YRS. HOUSE W

533450. KAKINAD

6. DANGETI RAMBA

CULTIATION, R

KAKINADA DISTR

7. VEGISETTI

PURUSHOTTAMA

D.NO.5-3-57, PITH

8. KOTHEM MADHA

E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

Y,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH

O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL

REVISION PETITION NO: 1719/2025

RAJU DIED, (DIED).

SWAMY, S/O LATE GURAYYA AG

R/O KONDAPPA VEEDHI, P

A DISTRICT.

BU, S/O LATE GURAYYA AGED AB

/O KONDAPPA VEEDHI, PITHAPU

CT.

...P

AND

RUSHOTHAMA RAO DIED, (DIED).

VENKATA

TIRUPATHYRA

ARAO

AGED

YRS.

3450. KAKINADA DISTRICT.

NI, W/O LATE NAGARAJU AGED A

THAPURAM-533450. KAKINADA DIS

MANI, W/O PATTABHIRAMAYYA A

E WIFE, PITHAPURAM-533450.

A SWAMY, S/O LATE GURAYYA AG

IFE, R/O KONDAPPA VEEDHI, P

DA DISTRICT.

ABU, S/O LATE GURAYYA AGED AB

R/O KONDAPPA VEEDHI, PITHAPU

RICT.

SATYANARAYANAMMA,

W/

ARAO AGED ABOUT 69 YRS. HOUS

HAPURAM-533450. KAKINADA DIST

AVI, W/O SATYANARAYANA AG

RC,J

CRP No.1719 of 2025

DESH

LAPATI

ED ABOUT 61

ITHAPURANN-

BOUT 54 YRS.

URAM-533450.

PETITIONER(S)

AO,

S/O

EMPLOYEE,

BOUT 80 YRS.

STRICT.

AGED ABOUT

KAKINADA

GED ABOUT 61

PITHAPURAM-

BOUT 54 YRS.

URAM-533450.

/O

LATE

SE WIFE, R/O

TRICT.

GED 52 YRS.

RC,J

HOUSE WIFE, R/O STUVERTIPETA, PITHAPURAM-533450.

KAKINADA DISTRICT.

9. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY THE DISTRICT

COLLECTOR, KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA-533001.

10. THE THASILDAR, PITHAPURAM URBAN MANDAL, PITHAPURAM-

533450. KAKINADA DISTRICT.

11. PITHAPURAM

MUNICIPALITY,

REP.

BY

COMMISSIONER,

PITHAPURAM-533450. KAKINADA DISTRICT

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to set aside the order Dt. 08-05-2025 in lA

NO.200/2025 IN OS NO.229/2017 passed by the Honble CIVIL JUDGE

(SENIOR DIVISION) PUHAPURAM and consequenity allow the same and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings in OS

NO.229/2017 on the file of the Hon'ble CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR DIVISION):

PITHAPURAM pending disposal of the main Civil Revision petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1.SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.T N M RANGA RAO

RC,J

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the orders dated 08.05.2025 passed in I.A.No.200 of 2025 in O.S.No.229 of 2017 by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Pithapuram.

2. The case status information placed on record by the Registry procured from eCourts System shows that O.S.No.229 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Pithapuram was dismissed without costs on 29.10.2025.

3. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.

4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 30th March, 2026.

RR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead