Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2997/2024 of MARTHALA JAYARAMI REDDY Vs SAMBATURU BHARAT BHUSHAN RAO on 29 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: 1. MARTHALA JAYARAMI REDDY, S/O LAKSHMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O DORASANIPALLE ROAD, PRODDATUR, YSR
APHC010489382024
IN TH
MONDAY
TWO
THE HONOURA
CIVIL R
Between:
1. MARTHALA JAYA
ABOUT 52 YEARS
YSR KADAPA DIST
1. SAMBATURU BHA
about 60 years, R/
Mandal, YSR Kada
Petition under Artic
circumstances stated in
pleased to set aside the
A.S.No.60/2018 on the fi
allowing the same and pa
IA NO: 1 OF 2024
Petition under Secti
in the affidavit filed in su
to STAY all further proce
Additional District Judge,
Counsel for the Petition
1.A SYAM SUNDAR R
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Y,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH
O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL
REVISION PETITION NO: 2997/2024
RAMI REDDY, S/O LAKSHMI RE
S, R/O DORASANIPALLE ROAD,
TRICT.
AND
RAT BHUSHAN RAO, S/o B. Subram
/o D.No.8/704, Gandhi Road, Prodd
apa District.
...R
le 227 of the Constitution of India,pra
n the grounds filed herein,the High
e Order dt.23-09-2024 passed in I.A
le of Hon'ble IV Additional District Ju
ass
on 151 CPC praying that in the circum
pport of the petition, the High Court m
eedings in A.S.No.60/2018 on the fi
Kadapa till disposal of the main CRP
ner:
REDDY
RC,J
CRP No.2997 of 2024
DESH
LAPATI
EDDY, AGED
PRODDATUR,
...PETITIONER
manyam, Aged
datur Town and
RESPONDENT
aying that in the
Court may be
.No.624/2024 in
dge, Kadapa by
mstances stated
may be pleased
le of Hon'ble IV
P and pass
RC,J
CRP No.2997 of 2024
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the orders dated 23.09.2024 passed in I.A.No.624 of 2024 in A.S.No.60 of 2018 by the learned IV Additional District Judge, Kadapa.
2. The case status information placed on record by the Registry procured from eCourts System shows that A.S.No.60 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Women Court-cum-VII Additional District Judge, Kadapa was dismissed with costs on 23.04.2025.
3. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 30th March, 2026.
RR