Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1679/2023 of ARJUN RAO NALLADI Vs GOPALA KRISHNA DWIVEDI,I.A.S on 29 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1679/2023 Between: 1. ARJUN RAO NALLADI, S/O N. VEERANJANEYULU, AGED 43
APHC010115932023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1679/2023
Between:
1. ARJUN RAO NALLADI, S/O N. VEERANJANEYULU, AGED
YEARS, BUSINESS,
R/O
H.NO 2-161, VELAS
(V),CHANDARLAPADU (M) NTR DIST.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. GOPALA
KRISHNA
DWIVEDI
I
A
S,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
OF
PANCHAYAT
RAJ
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETRIATE BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST.,
2. SRI S S RAWAT IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FOR
FINANCE AND PLANING DEPARTMENT, SECRETRIATE
BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST.,
3. SRI DHILLI RAO IAS, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NTR
DIST AT VIJAYAWADA.
4. SRI B SUBBA REDDY, THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF, PANCHAYAT RAJ DEPT, AMARAVATHI.
5. SRI AKKINENI VENKATESWARA RAO, THE EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER, PRI DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the contemnors/respondents under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act., for willfully disobeying the orders of Hon'ble Sri. Justice D.
Ramesh, passed in WP No.36540 of 2022, dated.23-11-2022 and to pass such other orders as are necessary in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K L N SWAMY
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. .
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 23.11.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.36540 of 2022.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions submits that order dated 23.11.2022, passed by this Court in W.P.No.36540 of 2022 has been complied with.
3. Recording the same, the contempt case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH
Date:30.03.2026 GK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH
CONTEMPT CASE NO:1679 of 2023
Dated:30.03.2026
GK