Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1985/2023 of SAI KRISHORE TRADERS Vs THE STATE OF AP on 29 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1985/2023 Between: 1. SAI KRISHORE TRADERS, REP. BY ITS PARTNER SURE CHINA SUBBA RAO, S/O.KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O.ADDANKI ROAD, DARSI TOWN, PRAKASAM
APHC010039162023
IN TH
MONDAY
TWO
THE HONOURA
W
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. SAI KRISHORE TR SUBBA RAO, S R/O.ADDANKI ROA
1. THE STATE OF CONSUMER AFFA BUILDINGS, VELA DISTRICT.
2. THE COLLECTOR C
3. THE ENFORCEME PRAKASAM DISTR
4. THE TAHSILDAR, R
5. THE INCHARGE GIDDALURU MAND
6. THE STATION HO RACHERLA, PRAK
7. THE VILLAGE R RACHERLA MANDA Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased (i) to issue a wr of Writ of Mandamus the disposal orders vide Rc.C seized stock of 464.00 E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 1985/2023 RADERS, REP. BY ITS PARTNER /O.KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT AD, DARSI TOWN, PRAKASAM DIST AND AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL AIRS FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, S AGAPUDI VILLAGE, TULLUR MAND CS, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ENT DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, MARKAP RICT. RACHERLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM D
OFFICER, M.L.A'S POINT, DAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. OUSE OFFICER, RACHERLA POLI KASAM DISTRICT. EVENUE OFFICER, ANUMALAPA AL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High rit, order or orders more particularly o action of the Respondent No.2, in pas CS1/6A/149/2022, dated 30.12.2022, 0 quintals of Rice in 928 plastic DESH
LAPATI SURE CHINA
YEARS, RICT. ...PETITIONER SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT DAL, GUNTUR PUR MANDAL, DISTRICT. GIDDALURU, ICE STATION, ALLI VILLAGE, SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be ne in the nature ssing the interim in respect of the bags worth of
Rs.46,400/- (PDS subsidized value) Rs.17,16,800/- (open market value) of the petitioner and in seizing and handing over the possession of M/s.Sri Venkateswara Rice and Flour Mill, Anumalapalli Village, to the 7th respondent, being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently (ii) to direct the respondents to release the seized stock of 464.00 quintals of Rice in 928 plastic bags worth of Rs.46,400/- (PDS subsidized value) Rs.17,16,800/- (open market value) of the petitioner (iii)to direct the respondents to unlock the rice mill and handed over the possession of M/s.Sri Venkateswara Rice and Flour Mill, Anumalapalli Village, to the petitioner by setting aside the order passed in Rc.CS1/6A/149/2022 dated 30.12.2022, by the Respondent No.2, and pass direct the respondents to unlock the rice mill and handed over the possession of M/s.Sri Venkateswara Rice & Flour Mill, Anumalapalli Village, to the petitioner by setting aside the order passed in Rc.CS1/6A/149/2022, dated 30.12.2022, by the Respondent No.2, and pass direct the respondents to release the seized stock of 464.00 quintals of Rice in 928 plastic bags worth of Rs.46,400/- (PDS subsidized value) Rs.17,16,800/- (open market value) of the petitioner by suspending the order passed in Rc.CS1/6A/149/2022, dated 30.12.2022, by the Respondent No.2 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
vacate the interim order dated 01-02-2023 in WP1985/2023 to dismiss the writ petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BINDU VEGIRAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following order:
Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 16.03.2026, 02.03.2026 and 16.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 30.03.2026 MP
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 1985 of 2023 Date: 30.03.2026
MP