Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/1985/2023 of SAI KRISHORE TRADERS Vs THE STATE OF AP on 29 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1985/2023 Between: 1. SAI KRISHORE TRADERS, REP. BY ITS PARTNER SURE CHINA SUBBA RAO, S/O.KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O.ADDANKI ROAD, DARSI TOWN, PRAKASAM

APHC010039162023

IN TH

MONDAY

TWO

THE HONOURA

W

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. SAI KRISHORE TR SUBBA RAO, S R/O.ADDANKI ROA

1. THE STATE OF CONSUMER AFFA BUILDINGS, VELA DISTRICT.

2. THE COLLECTOR C

3. THE ENFORCEME PRAKASAM DISTR

4. THE TAHSILDAR, R

5. THE INCHARGE GIDDALURU MAND

6. THE STATION HO RACHERLA, PRAK

7. THE VILLAGE R RACHERLA MANDA Petition under Articl circumstances stated in pleased (i) to issue a wr of Writ of Mandamus the disposal orders vide Rc.C seized stock of 464.00 E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL RIT PETITION NO: 1985/2023 RADERS, REP. BY ITS PARTNER /O.KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT AD, DARSI TOWN, PRAKASAM DIST AND AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL AIRS FOOD AND CIVIL SUPPLIES, S AGAPUDI VILLAGE, TULLUR MAND CS, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ENT DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, MARKAP RICT. RACHERLA MANDAL, PRAKASAM D

OFFICER, M.L.A'S POINT, DAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. OUSE OFFICER, RACHERLA POLI KASAM DISTRICT. EVENUE OFFICER, ANUMALAPA AL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RES le 226 of the Constitution of India pra the affidavit filed therewith, the High rit, order or orders more particularly o action of the Respondent No.2, in pas CS1/6A/149/2022, dated 30.12.2022, 0 quintals of Rice in 928 plastic DESH

LAPATI SURE CHINA

YEARS, RICT. ...PETITIONER SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT DAL, GUNTUR PUR MANDAL, DISTRICT. GIDDALURU, ICE STATION, ALLI VILLAGE, SPONDENT(S): aying that in the h Court may be ne in the nature ssing the interim in respect of the bags worth of

Rs.46,400/- (PDS subsidized value) Rs.17,16,800/- (open market value) of the petitioner and in seizing and handing over the possession of M/s.Sri Venkateswara Rice and Flour Mill, Anumalapalli Village, to the 7th respondent, being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently (ii) to direct the respondents to release the seized stock of 464.00 quintals of Rice in 928 plastic bags worth of Rs.46,400/- (PDS subsidized value) Rs.17,16,800/- (open market value) of the petitioner (iii)to direct the respondents to unlock the rice mill and handed over the possession of M/s.Sri Venkateswara Rice and Flour Mill, Anumalapalli Village, to the petitioner by setting aside the order passed in Rc.CS1/6A/149/2022 dated 30.12.2022, by the Respondent No.2, and pass direct the respondents to unlock the rice mill and handed over the possession of M/s.Sri Venkateswara Rice & Flour Mill, Anumalapalli Village, to the petitioner by setting aside the order passed in Rc.CS1/6A/149/2022, dated 30.12.2022, by the Respondent No.2, and pass direct the respondents to release the seized stock of 464.00 quintals of Rice in 928 plastic bags worth of Rs.46,400/- (PDS subsidized value) Rs.17,16,800/- (open market value) of the petitioner by suspending the order passed in Rc.CS1/6A/149/2022, dated 30.12.2022, by the Respondent No.2 pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

vacate the interim order dated 01-02-2023 in WP1985/2023 to dismiss the writ petition in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BINDU VEGIRAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR HOME

2. GP FOR REVENUE

3. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

The Court made the following order:

Though the matter is listed today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. On earlier occasions also i.e., on 16.03.2026, 02.03.2026 and 16.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications are closed.

___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 30.03.2026 MP

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 1985 of 2023 Date: 30.03.2026

MP

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead