Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3713/2025 of P. VENKATA RAMI REDDY Vs PEEYUSH KUMAR, IAS on 29 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3713/2025 Between: 1. P. VENKATA RAMI REDDY, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. LATE CHINNA MALLA
APHC010646402025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3713/2025
Between:
1. P. VENKATA RAMI REDDY, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. LATE
CHINNA
MALLA
REDDY,
D.N0.25/117-B,
SANJEEVANAGAR,
NANDYAL,
NANDYAL
DISTRICT,
ANDHRA PRADESH.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. PEEYUSH
KUMAR
IAS,
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY,
DEPARTMENT
OF
FINANCE
AND
PLANNING
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT,
2. G SAI PRASAD IAS, SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, IRRIGATION
AND
CAD
DEPARTMENT
(WATER
RESOURCES DEPARTMENT), SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. BALA CHANDRA REDDY, SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER, WATER
RESOURCES
DEPARTMENT,
IRRIGATION
CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
4. E
PRATHAP,
EXECUTIVE
ENGINEER,
WATER
RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, K C CANAL DIVISION, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.
5. B RAVI KUMAR, THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, KC SUB-DIVISION, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S):
Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to direct the notices to the Respondents herein and punish the Respondents under sections 10
to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberate, intentional and willful violation of the orders of this Hon’ble Court dated 17-04-2025
in WP.No.26160 of 2024.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. THATHIREDDY ASHOK SRIVASTAVA
Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU PULLAGURA
2. VENKATA SAI KRISHNA PONNURU
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the order, dated 17.04.2025, passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.26160 of 2024, is duly complied with by the respondents and no further orders are required to be passed in this Contempt Case.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:30.03.2026 DSH