Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5084/2011 of POKURI SARADA, PRAKASAM DIST. Vs REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYD. on 29 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR WRIT PETITION NO: 5084/2011 Between: 1. POKURI SARADA,
APHC010518082011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 5084/2011
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. POKURI SARADA, PRAKASAM DIST., D/O. KOTAIAH R/O. PONDURU POST, TANGUTURU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. REGISTRAR HIGH COURT OF A P HYD, Hyderabad, rep. by its Registrar (Recruitment)
...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ (i) declare the Notification No. 29/2011-RC, dated 28-1-2011 issued by the Respondent in so far as prescribing the cut of date as 01.02.2011 for the upper age limit for direct recruitment to the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) as irrational and arbitraryand consequently direct the respondent to prescribe the cut of date as 01.01.2011 in the Notification No.29/2011-RC, dated 28.01.2011; and (ii) permit the petitioner to apply for the post and compete the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) in pursuance of the Notification No. 29/2011-RC, dated 28-1- 2011 issued by the Respondent IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 6300 OF 2011
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the respondent to entertain the application by permitting the petitioner to appear for the competitive examination for the post of Civil Judge (Junior Division) by suspending the Clause III (i) of the Notification No.29/2011-RC, dated 28.01.2011 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 29665 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K UDAYA SRI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. Y RAMA RAO(SC FOR APHC)
2. VENKATESWARLU POSANI
The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J
________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J
Date:30.03.2026 MJA
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 5084/2011 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao)
30.03.2026
MJA