Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLP/2347/2026 of HIMANSU SUNA Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2347/2026 Between: 1. HIMANSU SUNA, S/O LEMOK, AGED ABOUT 51

APHC010154132026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

Between:

1. HIMANSU

SUNA,

S/O

LEMOK,

AGED

ABOUT

YEARS,MALKANGIRI

COLONY,

MALKANGIRI

BLOCK

AND

DISTRICT.ODISHA- 764048

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

AND

1. THE

STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

Rep.

by

its

Public

Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra Pradesh at AmaravatiThrough the Station House Officer,Annavaram Police Station,Alluri Sitharama Raju District.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS

praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to enlarge the petitioner/A7 on bail in Crime No. 19/2025 On the file of Annavaram PS, Alluri Sitaramaraju Dist.

registered under sections 20 (b) (ii) (C), 25 r/w 8(c) NDPS Act on such terms and conditions as deemed fit and proper in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

1. AMARAVATI LAW CHAMBERS

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.T.Reddy, learned counsel representing M/s. Amaravati Law Chambers, for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.

4. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.03.2026. UPS

Dt.30.03.2026

UPS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead