Andhra Pradesh High Court

CMA/178/2026 of PAPPULA SRIDHAR Vs SRI MURALI KRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS on 29 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3572] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 178/2026

APHC010719602025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 178/2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. PAPPULA SRIDHAR, S/O. RAMA RAO, HINDU, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-112, GOKAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

- 533 286. APPELLANT NO.1/RESPONDENT NO.01 / DEFENDANT NO.1

2. PAPPULA NAGAMANI, W/O PAPPULA SRIDHAR, S/O. RAMA RAO, HINDU, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-112, GOKAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 533 286. APPELLANT NO.2/RESPONDENT NO.02 / DEFENDANT NO.2

...APPELLANT DAND

1. SRI MURALI KRISHNA CONSTRUCTIONS, A REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, GANESULA RAMBABU, S/O. MULAYYA, HINDU, AGED 58 YEARS,

R/O. D.NO.3-59/1, RAJUPALEM VILLAGE, KIRLAMPUDI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. GANESULA LAKSHMAN RAO, S/O. MULAYYA, HINDU, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.3-59/2, RAJUPALEM VILLAGE,

KIRLAMPUDI MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

3. PAMU SRINIVAS, S/O. VEERARAGHAVULU, HINDU, AGED 41 YEARS, D.NO.6-120, GOLLAPROLU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. THOTA CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/O. VEERA NARASIMHA RAO, HINDU, AGED 38 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.5-46, JAGGAMPETA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

5. SATYAMSETTI PADMANABHAM, S/O. BRAHMAJI, HINDU, AGED 55 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.68-10-1/11B, VIDYUTH NAGAR, NANCY STREET, NEAR IDEAL COLLEGE, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant:

1. KARTHIKSIDDARTHA SALADI Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. The Court made the following:

I.A.No.2 of 2026 IN/AND CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.178 of 2026 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

The C.M.A has been filed under Order 43 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the defendants in the suit, challenging the order dated 19.02.2025 passed in O.S.No.13 of 2025, whereby an ad-interim injunction was granted in I.A.No.176 of 2025 while issuing notice to the respondents.

2. I.A.No.2 of 2026 has been filed to condone the delay of 216 days.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants/defendants have already filed objections before the learned Trial Court, which are pending for consideration.

4. The reasons shown in the affidavit in support of I.A.No.2 of 2026 for an inordinate delay of 216 days in challenging the said order, are not sufficient.

5. Further, since the objections have already been filed, which are said to be pending for consideration before the learned Trial Court, we are not inclined to entertain the present C.M.A.

6. If I.A.No.176 of 2025 is still pending for consideration before the learned Trial Court, to which the objections have been filed as stated, the same shall be expedited by the learned Trial Court.

7. The application, I.A.No.2 of 2026 is rejected.

8. Consequently, the C.M.A. is also rejected with the aforesaid observations. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J

_____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Date: 30.03.2026. Pab

I.A.No.2 of 2026 IN/AND CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.178 of 2026 30.03.2026

Pab

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead