Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/3344/2019 of G B DAS Vs THE STATE OF AP on 29 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 3344/2019 Between: 1. G B DAS, S/O. NAGABHUSHAN RAO, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS,
APHC010075342019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 3344/2019
Between:
1. G B DAS, S/O. NAGABHUSHAN RAO, AGED 47 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. QUARTER NO.18, LABOUR COLONY, MASIJID
STREET, VIDHYADHARA PURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA
DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE THAHSILDAR, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA URBAN
3. MANDAL
SURVEYOR,
VIJAYAWADA
URBAN,
KRISHNA
DISTRICT.
4. VILLAGE REVENUE OFFICER, BHAVANIPURAM. VIJAYAWADA
URBAN.
5. PYLABALA SRINIVAS, S/O. SURI BABU, AGED- 45 YEARS, R/O.
DOOR
NO.9-8-21,
SIMHADRI
STREET,
KOTHAPET,
JS,J
W.P.No.3344 of 2019
VIJAYAWADA-1.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or orders or writ more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in interfering and conducting survey in the petitioner's land to an extent of 300.0 sq. yards in Plot No.3 R.S.No.48/2 Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada City as illegal, arbitrary, highhandedness, without jurisdiction and violation of principles of Natural Justice and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's land to an extent of 300.0 sq. yards in Plot No.3 R.S.No.48/2, Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada City IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to disposes and not to interfere in any manner with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's agricultural land admeasuring Ac.5.34
cents
in
Sy.No.473-1B,
Ac.5.00cents in Sy.No. 473-1B and Ac.2.02 cents in Sy.No. 104-2B
respectively of the petitioners each situated at Maddelachervu village, Kanganapally Mandal, Ananthapur district pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BARRE SREENIVASARAO
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
This Court made the following:
JS,J
W.P.No.3344 of 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Though the matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 30th March, 2026 cbs
JS,J W.P.No.3344 of 2019
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.3344 of 2019
30th March, 2026 cbs