Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/2263/2026 of Mohammed Muzamil alias Mujamil Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2263/2026 Between: 1. MOHAMMED MUZAMIL ALIAS MUJAMIL,
APHC010148272026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2263/2026
Between:
1. MOHAMMED MUZAMIL ALIAS MUJAMIL, S/O JAMEEL AHMEDAGE
38 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE EMPLOYEE,R/O. H.NO. 121/1, 8TH
CROSS,
SHIVAJI
ROAD,N.R.
MOHALLA,
NARASIMHA
RAJU
MOHALLA,MYSORE TOWN, TALUK DISTRICT,KARNATAKA STATE.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC
PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT AMARAVATHI,HROUGH
RSASTF POLICE STATION TIRUPATHITIRUPATHI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to petitioner/ Accused no.3 on bail in Cr. No. 60 of 2025 on the file of RSASTF Police Station, Tirupati and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice. enlarge/release Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. V NITESH
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2263 OF 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Petition with a liberty to file fresh petition at appropriate time.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the Petitioner to file fresh Criminal Petition at appropriate time.
___________________________________
DR.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 30.03.2026 S D P
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2263 OF 2026 30.03.2026
W S D P