Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/2305/2026 of Rohan Sisodiya alias Rohan Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2305/2026 Between: 1. ROHAN SISODIYA ALIAS ROHAN, S/O.SOHAN, AGED ABOUT
APHC010151152026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. ROHAN SISODIYA ALIAS ROHAN, S/O.SOHAN, AGED ABOUT 30
YEARS,R/O.DHANIGHATI VILLAGE, HOTPIPLIYA TALUK POST AND
MANDAL DEVAS DISTRICT, MADHYA PRADESH STATE
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE
STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
THROUGH
S.H.O.,
ULINDAKONDA P.S.,REP BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT
OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AT AMARAVATI
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the petitioner/Accused No.9 on bail in Crime No.153/2019 of Ulindakonda P.S., pending disposal of the case Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. HABIBULLA SHAIK
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Criminal Petition, under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner/Accused No.9, seeking regular bail, in PRC No.4 of 2022 in Crime No.153/2019 of Ulindakonda P.S., registered for the offences under Section 395 of Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”).
2. Heard Sri Habibulla Shaik, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.
3. During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that Test Identification Parade for this petition is pending. Investigating Officer, made a request to the concerned Magistrate Court for conducting the Test Identification Parade.
4. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that let there be a direction to the concerned Court for completing the process of Test Identification Parade, so that the petitioner can file a fresh application at appropriate time.
5. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. However, the concerned Court is directed to complete the process of Test Identification
Parade as per the request made by the Investigating Officer without any further delay.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition shall stand closed.
__________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.03.2026. UPS
Dt.30.03.2026
UPS