Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/1608/2025 of DANGETI APPALARAJU DIED Vs VEGISETTY PURUSHOTHAMA RAO DIED on 29 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: Between: 1. DANGETI APPALARAJU DIED, (DIED). 2. DANGETI VEERASWAMY, S/O LATE GURAYYA AGED ABOUT 61 YRS. BUSINESS,
APHC010328822025
IN TH
MONDAY
TWO
THE HONOURA
CIVIL R
Between:
1. DANGETI APPALAR
2. DANGETI VEERAS
YRS. BUSINESS,
KAKINADA DISTRIC
3. DANGETI RAMBAB
CULTIVATION, R/
KAKINADA DISTRIC
1. VEGISETTY PURU
2. VEGISEETTY
PURUSHOTHAMAR
533450. KAKINADA
3. DANGETI BHAVAN
HOUSE WIFE, PIT
4. ACHANTA NAGAM
YRS. HOUSE WIFE
5. DANGETI VEERA S
YRS. HOUSE WIF
533450. KAKINADA
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Y,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH
O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL
REVISION PETITION NO: 1608/2025
RAJU DIED, (DIED).
SWAMY, S/O LATE GURAYYA AG
R/O KONDAPPA VEEDHI, PITHAPU
CT.
BU, S/O LATE GURAYYA AGED AB
/O KONDAPPA VEEDHI, PITHAPU
CT.
...P
AND
SHOTHAMA RAO DIED, (DIED).
VENKATA
TIRUPATHYRA
RAO AGED 46 YRS. EMPLOYEE, P
A DISTRICT.
NI, W/O LATE NAGARAJU AGED AB
HAPURAM-533450. KAKINADA DIST
MANI, W/O PATTABHIRAMAYYA AG
E, PITHAPURAM-533450. KAKINADA
SWAMY, S/O LATE GURAYYA AG
FE, R/O KONDAPPA VEEDHI, P
A DISTRICT.
RC,J
DESH
LAPATI
ED ABOUT 61
URAM-533450.
BOUT 54 YRS.
URAM-533450.
PETITIONER(S)
AO,
S/O
PITHAPURAM-
BOUT 80 YRS.
TRICT.
GED ABOUT 57
A DISTRICT.
ED ABOUT 61
PITHAPURAM-
RC,J
6. DANGETI RAMBABU, S/O LATE GURAYYA AGED ABOUT 54 YRS.
CULTIATION, R/O KONDAPPA VEEDHI, PITHAPURAM-533450.
KAKINADA DISTRICT.
7. VEGISETTI
SATYANARAYANAMMA,
W/O
LATE
PURUSHOTTAMARAO AGED ABOUT 69 YRS. HOUSE WIFE, R/O
D.NO.5-3-57, PITHAPURAM-533450. KAKINADA DISTRICT.
8. KOTHEM MADHAVI, W/O SATYANARAYANA AGED 52 YRS. HOUSE
WIFE, R/O STUVERTIPETA, PITHAPURAM-533450. KAKINADA
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased topleased to set aside the order Dt. 08-05-2025 in lA.NO. 1146/2024
IN OS NO.229/2017 passed by the Hon'ble CIVIL JUDGE (SENIOR
DIVISION) PITHAPURAM and consequenity allow the same and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.SRINIVASA RAO PAPPU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.T N M RANGA RAO
2.
RC,J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the orders dated 08.05.2025 passed in I.A.No.1146 of 2024 in O.S.No.229 of 2017 by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Pithapuram.
2. The case status information placed on record by the Registry procured from eCourts System shows that O.S.No.229 of 2017 on the file of the Court of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Pithapuram was dismissed without costs on 29.10.2025.
3. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 30th March, 2026.
RR