Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/1692/2019 of T. ANNAYYA Vs The Union of India on 29 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1692/2019 Between: 1. T. ANNAYYA, T. ANNAYYA, S/O LATE GOVINDA SWAMY NAIDU, AGED 48
APHC010994682018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 1692/2019
Between:
1. T. ANNAYYA, T. ANNAYYA, S/O LATE GOVINDA SWAMY
NAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O BOYA CHINNAGANAPALLI
VILLAGE,
CHINTHAMAKULA
PALLI
POST,
V.
KOTA
MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE UNION OF INDIA, THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF
ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, REP. BY ITS
SECRETARY, NEW DELHI.
2. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP.
BY ITS CHAIRMAN, NEW DELHI.
3. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI.
4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, /COMPETENT AUTHORITY
FOR LAND ACQUISITION TO N.H.NO.234 NEW NO.75, CHITTOOR.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing notification No.360 dt.29-01-
2018 for acquisition of the lands of the petitioner in Sy.No.182/1A
and 182/2B of Boyachinnaganapalli village, V. Kota Mandal, Chittoor District without considering the objection of the petitioner and without considering the request for alternative land, as highly illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to change the alignment of the road or to consider the request of the petitioner for alternative lands in the interest of justice.
IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from his lands in Sy.No.182/1A and 182/2B of Boyachinnaganapalli village, V. Kota Mandal, Chittoor district pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. AFSAR JAHAN
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter was listed consecutively on 15.02.2019, 19.01.2023 and 27.01.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and, consequently, the matter was directed to be listed on 06.02.2023 under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’. On 03.03.2026, when the matter was listed, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed next.
2. Even today, when the matter is listed under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
3. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter.
4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:30.03.2026 DSH