Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLP/2367/2026 of Garla Sudheer Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 29 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2367/2026 Between: 1. GARLA SUDHEER, S/O. RAMAN, AGED ABOUT 21

APHC010155562026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

Between:

1. GARLA SUDHEER, S/O. RAMAN, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS,R/O

PAIDIKALAVA,

VALLURU

MANDAL,

YSR

KADAPA

DISTRICT,ANDHRA PRADESH, 524346.

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

AND

1. THE

STATE

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH,

REP.

BY

PUBLIC

PROSECUTOR,HIGH

COURT

OF

ANDHRA

PRADESH

AT

AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT,522239.

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS

praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to release the Petitioner/A-15p on bail pending enquiry and trial into Crime No.450/2025 of Badvel (U) Police Station, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

1. MANTAPAMPALLE RAMPRASAD

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Mantapampalle Ramprasad, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing on behalf of the State is in attendance.

4. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh petition as and when required.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 30.03.2026. UPS

Dt.30.03.2026

UPS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead