Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/2267/2026 of Kalli Sandeep Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 29 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2267/2026 Between: 1. KALLI SANDEEP, S/O CHITTI BABU, AGED ABUT 41
APHC010148242026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2267/2026
Between:
1. KALLI SANDEEP, S/O CHITTI BABU, AGED ABUT 41 YEARS. OCC.
BUSINESS, R/O H.NO. 36-9-29 MATTAVARI VEEDHI, NEHRU
NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA URBAN, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, through S.H.O., Krishnalanka Police Station, NTR District, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Amaravati
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Courtpleased to enlarge the petitioner herein on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with FIR No. 44 of 2026 of Krishnalanka Police Station, NTR District, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. S V INDIRA
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
The Court made the following:
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2267 of 2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Mrs. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that the petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody and hence, the relief sought has become infructuous.
2. Recording the above said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________________________
Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Date: 30.03.2026 ARB
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2267/2026
Date: 30.03.2026
ARB