Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/1567/2018 of S.Siva Rama Krishan Reddy, Vs Sri R.Karikal Valaven, IAS, on 29 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1567/2018

APHC010471992018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1567/2018

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. S.SIVA RAMA KRISHAN REDDY,, AGED 53 YEARS, WORKING AS ASSISTANT ENGINEE, TADEPALLI MUNICIPALITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. SRI R KARIKAL VALAVEN IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, STATE OF A.P., VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. SRI V CHANDRAIAH, ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, PUBLIC HEALTH AND MUNICIPAL ENGINEERING, TEDEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to summon and punish the Respondent contemnor under Section 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for wilfully violating and disobeying the orders passed by the Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No.17573 of 2017 dated 30- 4-2018 in the interest of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P V RAMANA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. The Court made the following: ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of the Court has been complied with by the respondents and thereby prayed to close the contempt case.

2. Therefore, recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

Date: 30.03.2026 ARR

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1567/2018 Date: 30.03.2026

ARR

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead