Andhra Pradesh High Court
CMA/712/2025 of BALA VENKATA SEETHA Vs SIVA NAGESWARA RAO @ SIVA NAGI REDDY on 29 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 712/2025 Between: 1. BALA VENKATA SEETHA, W/O. SIVA NAGESWARA RAO @ SIVA NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 28
APHC010503222025
IN TH
MONDAY
TWO
THE HONOUR
THE HONOUR
CIVIL MISC
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. BALA VENKATA S NAGI REDDY, A DHAMMANAVARIP BAPATIA DISTRICT
1. SIVA NAGESWARA Reddy, Aged about village, Karlapalem Appeal Under Sect Miscellaneous Appeal b H.M.O.P. No. 92 OF 202 (Senior Division) (F.T.C.) IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Secti in the affidavit filed in su pleased to suspend the on the file of the Hon'b Bapatia, and pass E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Y,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT RABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TIL RABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAM CELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 712/202 SEETHA, W/O. SIVA NAGESWARA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O. PAIEM VILLAGE, KARLAPAIEN T. AND A RAO SIVA NAGI REDDY, S/o. t 33 years, R/o. D. No. 4-1, Dhamn Mandal, Bapatia District. ...R tion_____against orderspleased to by setting aside the order dated 22 on the file of the Hon'ble Additio ) Bapatla and pass on 151 CPC praying that in the circum pport of the petition, the High Court m order dated 18.06.2025 in H.M.O.P. N ble Additional Civil Judge (Senior Di DESH
LHARI MALLI
RAO @ SIVA D. NO. 4-1, N MANDAL, ...APPELLANT Bala Sanjeeva nnanavaripalem RESPONDENT allow the Civil 18.06.2025 in onal Civil Judge mstances stated may be pleased No. 92 OF 2022 vision) (F.T.C.):
Counsel for the Appellant:
1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI Counsel for the Respondent:
1. VENKATESH KOSARAJU The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 712/2025 JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)
The matter has been listed under the caption for appearance pursuant to the order dated 12.03.2026 and 05.03.2026.
2. The memo has been filed for withdrawal of the appeal by learned counsel for the appellant-wife. Along with the said memo a letter of the appellant addressed to her counsel has also been annexed.
3. Ms.Bala Venkata Seetha, appellant appears along with Sri K.Ashok, learned counsel representing Sri I.Koti Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant. They submit that the appeal be dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Recording the same, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
No order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J
____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J
Dated:30.03.2026 AG
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 712/2025
Dated:30.03.2026 AG