Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/2158/2026 of Gattunu Adrustam Naidu, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 23 March 2026
COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2158/2026 Between: 1.GATTUNU ADRUSTAM NAIDU,, S/O. LATE RAJULU ALIAS
APHC010141592026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1.GATTUNU ADRUSTAM NAIDU,, S/O. LATE RAJULU ALIAS RAJAM
NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/O. SUKURU VILLAGE AND
PANCHAYAT,HUKUMPETA MANDAL,ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DT.
2.THALAMARLA ANJANEYULU,, S/O. LAKSHAMANNA, AGED ABOUT
YEARS,
R/O.
SUKURU
VILLAGE
AND
PANCHAYAT,
HUKUMPETA
MANDAL,
ALLURI
SITHARAMA
RAJU
DISTRICT
CURRENTLY
RESIDING
AT
H.NO.4-4,
MAIN
ROAD,
B.
RAMAPURAM VILLAGE, DONNIKOTA PANCHAYAT,
GOPEPALLE
MANDAL, SRI SATYA SAI DISTRICT, A.P.
3.VANTARI CHANDRA SEKHAR,, S/O. SURIBABU, AGED ABOUT 22
YEARS, R/O. SUKURU VILLAGE AND PANCHAYAT, HUKUMPETA
MANDAL, ALLURI SITHARAMA RAJU DISTRICT,
CURRENTLY
RESIDING
AT
NAXALAYITIA
COLONY,
KUNCHANGI
CENTER,
ANAKAPALLE MANDAL AND DISTRICT, A.P.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S)
AND
1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh.
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.GOLLAPALLI MAHESWARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G.Mahenswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Mrs. K. Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, appears on behalf of the State and is in attendance.
4. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.03.2026 SAB
Dt.24.03.2026 SAB