Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/866/2026 of BHASKAR REDDY Vs V SRINIVASULU on 23 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION N Between: Bhaskar Reddy, S/o. J. Employee, R/o. D.N0.28 Chittoor AND 1. V.Srinivasulu, S/o. V.Vadivelu, Aged about 58 years, Occ
APHC010129382026
IN TH
TUESDAY, T
TWO
THE HONOURA
CIVIL RE
Between:
Bhaskar Reddy, S/o.
Employee, R/o. D.N0
Chittoor
AND
1.
V.Srinivasulu
Employee, R
Colony, Chitto
2.
Saritha, W/o
Housewife, R
Colony, Chitto
Petition under Art
the circumstances stat
be pleased to permit
Petition against the O
O.S. No.263 of 2023
Judge (Junior Division
Excise, Chittoor.
I.A. No.1 OF 2026
Petition under Se
stated in the affidavit f
be pleased to stay all f
2023 on the file of Ho
Division) Cum Specia
Chittoor pending dispo
Counsel for the Petiti
Counsel for the Resp
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MAR
O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
ABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYAS
EVISION PETITION No.866 OF 2026
J.Venkata Reddy, Aged about 67
0.28-394/1B, Sai Baba Street, Ramn
D
, S/o. V.Vadivelu, Aged about 58
R/o. D.No.28-394/2B, Sai Baba Stree
oor.
. Bhaskar Reddy, Aged about 55
R/o. D.N0.28-394/1B, Sai Baba Stree
oor.
...R
ticle 227 of the Constitution of India, p ted in the grounds filed herein, the Hi the petitioner to file the present C
Orders dated 19.01.2026 in I.A. No.10
on the file of Hon'ble Court of VI A
) cum Special Judicial Magistrate of F
ection 151 CPC praying that in the c
filed in support of the petition, the Hig further Proceedings in the Suit Vide O
on'ble Court of VI Additional Civil J
al Judicial Magistrate of First Class
sal of the Civil Revision Petition.
oner
:
Mr.Harinath Reddy So
pondents:
---
DESH
RCH
SURYA
7 years, Occ
nagar Colony,
...Petitioner
8 years, Occ
et, Ramnagar
5 years, Occ
et, Ramnagar
Respondents
praying that in
gh Court may
Civil Revision
00 of 2024 in
Additional Civil
First Class for
circumstances
gh Court may
O.S. No.263 of
Judge (Junior
s for Excise,
oma
The Court made the following ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Considered the submissions made and perused the order under revision.
2.
Though the learned counsel for the petitioner sought to impress upon the Court that the power of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has to be invoked, in view of the order passed by the learned Trial Court, which constitutes failure to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it, this Court see no ground to interfere with the order under revision.
3.
Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________
NINALA JAYASURYA,J
March 24, 2026.
vasu
REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1. V SRINIVASULU, S/o. V. Vadivelu, Aged about 58 years, Occ Employee, R/o. D.N0.28-394/2B, Sai Baba Street, Ramnagar Colony, Chittoor.
2. Saritha, W/o. Bhaskar Reddy, Aged about 55 years, Occ Housewife, R/o. D.N0.28-394/1B, Sai Baba Street, Ramnagar Colony, Chittoor.
3. One CC to SRI. HARINATH REDDY SOMA Advocate [OPUC]
4. One CC to SRI. Advocate [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT
DATED:24/03/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
CRP NO. 866 OF 2026