Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRP/1073/2024 of P RAMI REDDY Vs M/S SRI SAI ANJANA CHIT FUNDS PVT LTD on 23 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1073/2024 Between: 1. P RAMI REDDY, S/O SUBBAIAH, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC

APHC010023032024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1073/2024

Between:

1. P RAMI REDDY, S/O SUBBAIAH, AGED 36 YEARS, OCC GOVT.

EMPLOYEE (SI OF POLICE), R/O POLICE QUARTERS, NEAR

BANAGANAPALLE PS, KURNOOL (NANDHYALA) DISTRICT .

...PETITIONER

AND

1. M/S SRI SAI ANJANA CHIT FUNDS PVT LTD, REG. AND CORP

OFFICE AT H.NO. 24-6-416, 2 ND FLOOR, SARASWATHI

NAGAR, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE CITY

REP. BY ITS LEGAL OFFICER, INAGANTIPRABHAKAR, BEING

AUTHORIZED PERSON MR. SHAIK ALLI BABU

2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, DISTRICT POLICE

OFFICE, NANDYAL, KURNOOL (NANDYAL) DISTRICT.

3. BOGIREDDY CHANDRA MOHAN REDDY, S/O NADIPISIDDA

REDDY, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.

1-2,

SOMIREDDYPALLI

VILLAGE,

BRAMHAMGARIMAAM

MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

4. ANNPUREDDY BHASKAR REDDY, S/O NADLIPISIDDA AGED

ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 8-2-23, ASR

SHOPPING MALL, MYDUKUR ROAD, BADVELTOPWN, YSR

KADAPA DISTRICT

5. LEKKALA

LAKSHMI

NARAYANA

REDDY,

S/O

NARAYANAREDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC JUNIOR

ASSISTANT, THE CHIEF ENGINEER, NTR TELUGU GANGA

PROJECT, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

6. PASUPULETI VENKATA SUBBAIAH, S/O VENKATASUBBAIAH, AGED

ABOUT

YEARS,

OCC

BUSINESS,

SRI

ANJAEYAVENKATA

VEERABRAMHENDRA

WHOLESALE

BANGLE

STORES,

OPP-ESWARAMMA

TEMPLE,

BRAMHAMGARI MATAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, YSR

KADAPA DISTRICT.

7. SREEYAPUREDDY EESWAR REDDY, S/O SUBBI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 8/144, VEERANARAYANAPURAM VILLAGE, BRAMHAMGARIMATAM

MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the Garnishee Order dated 18.10.2023 in E.P.No.134 of 2023 in Dispute No. 234 of 2018 on the file of the Honourable Principal Senior Civil Judge at Nellore and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the filing of the certified copy of Garnishee Order dated 18.10.2023 in E.P.No.134 of 2023 in Dispute No. 234 of 2018 on the file of the Honourable Principal Senior Civil Judge at Nellore, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to withhold the salary of the petitioner under Garnishee order dated 18.10.2023 in EP No. 134 of 2023 on the file of the Principle Senior Civil Judge at Nellore pending disposal of Civil Revision Petition and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. BHARATHI KUMARI KARRI

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

On 24.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. On 10.03.2026, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through virtual mode and sought time. Today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

Registry has placed the case information status on record, which indicates that on 08.01.2026 the EP was closed.

In view of the same, there remains nothing for adjudication, accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________

JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

Date: 24th March, 2026

RKS

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead