Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1119/2014 of Nomula Prasada Rao Vs M/s K.P.Estate and Developers, on 23 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [2102] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1119/2014 Between: 1. NOMULA PRASADA RAO, S/O KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 43
APHC010571212014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1119/2014
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. NOMULA PRASADA RAO, S/O KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 4-5-61/4, G.V.R. MAHILA COLLEGE ROAD, SAIBABA ROAD, GUNTUR.
...PETITIONER AND
1. M/S K P ESTATE AND DEVELOPERS, REP. BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER PALAKOLLU RAJESWARA RAO S/O RAGHAVAIAH, R/O D.NO. 5-91-18/5 K.P. BHAVAN, LAKSHMIPURAM, 4TH LINE, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. PALAKOLLU RAJESWARA RAO, S/O RAGHAVAIAH, R/O D.NO. 5-9- 4, 2/17, BRODIPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. PALAKOLLU SUJATHA, S/O PALAKOLLU RAJESWARA RAO D.NO. 5-19-4, 2/17, BRODIPET, GUNTUR DIST.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J RAJESWAR Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. The Court made the following ORDER :
The contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order of this Court dated 03.01.2014 passed in C.R.P.M.P.No.7168 of 2013 in C.R.P.No.5172 of 2013.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up, the Registry has placed on record, the order passed in C.R.P.No.5172 of 2013, whereby the main civil revision petition itself was dismissed as infructuous. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication.
3. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 24.03.2026 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1119/2014 Dt: 24.03.2026 Dvs