Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/12610/2023 of PILLI DURGA RAO Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 23 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 12610/2023 Between: 1. PILLI DURGA RAO, S/O VENKAIAH, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC.
APHC010240622023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION NO: 12610/2023
Between:
1. PILLI DURGA RAO, S/O VENKAIAH, AGED 44 YEARS, OCC.
BUSINESS,
R/O
D.NO.3-52,
NARMADA
NAGAR,
VISSANNAPETA, KHAMBHAMPADU, KRISHNA DISTRICT- 521227, FRIENDS ELECTRONICS SCALE SERVICE.
2. PALLPAMULA RATNAM,, S/O BHASKAR RAO, AGED 47
YEARS,
OCC.
BUSINESS,
R/O
D.NO.7-23,
K.SITHARAMAPURAM, SRINARASANNNAPALEM, KRISHNA
DISTRICT-521105, PRABHU SCALE SERVICE.
3. MEDA RAJENDRA RAO,, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC.
BUSINESS,
R/O
D.NO.2-21,
MITTAGUDEM,
TATAKUNTLA, VISANNAPET MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT- 521215, KIRANMAYI SCALE SERVICE.
4. NANDEPU MOSHE,, S/O SUNADAM, AGED 45 YEARS, OCC.
BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.29-25, NEW RAJARAJESWARIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT-520003, HANISH SCALE
SERVICE.
5. BOKINALA VIJAYA KUMAR,, S/O YESU RATNAM, AGED 44
YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.32-13-53/138, INDIRA
NAGAR,
OPP.
AMMA
KALYANA
MANDAPAM,
MOGHALARAJPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT- 521227, CHANDRA WEIGHING SERVICES.
6. RENTAPALLI KIRAN KUMAR,, S/O SUBBA RAO, AGED 49
YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.1-3/20-6, TANUKU VAN
STREET,
VIDHYADHARAPURAM,
VIJAWADA,
KRISHNA
DISTRICT-521227, RAVI TEJA SCALE SERVICE.
7. MOHAMMAD KHADAR,, S/O MOHAMMAD MASTHAN, AGED 46
YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.13-182, CHANDALURU, NANDIGAMA, NTR DISTRICT-521185. AMMA ELECTRONIC
SERVICE.
...PETITIONER(S)
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY
TO
GOVERNMENT,
CIVIL
SUPPLIES
DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT,
VELAGAPUDI,
GUNTUR
DISTRICT.
2. THE
COMMISSIONER,
CIVIL
SUPPLIES
DEPARTMENT,
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, D.NO.10-152-1, CIVIL
SUPPLIES BHAVAN, 19T FLOOR, ASHOKNAGAR, BANDARU
ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.
3. THE CONTROLLER OF LEGAL METROLOGY, METROLOGY
DEPARTMENT, D.NO.10-152-1, CIVIL SUPPLIES BHAVAN, 1ST
FLOOR, ASHOKNAGAR, BANDARU ROAD, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.
4. THE
JOINT
CONTROLLER
OF
LEGAL
METROLOGY,
METROLOGY DEPARTMENT, SIDDHARTHA NAGAR, 1ST LINE, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH.
5. THE
DEPUTY
CONTROLLER
OF
LEGAL
METROLOGY,
METROLOGY DEPARTMENT, SIDDHARTHA NAGAR, 1ST LINE, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the
respondents in imposing condition that restricting/limiting the read of jurisdiction of the petitioners to Krishna District in so far as repairs works is concerned is bad, illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, contrary to law, amounts of non-application of mind, contrary to Rules, Contrary to Act and in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14, 19
and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to remove such condition and allow the petitioners to work throughout the Andhra Pradesh State, whenever they get customers and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation dated 24.02.2023 submitted by the Association on behalf of the petitioners forthwith, requesting the respondents to permit the petitioners to work throughout the Andhra Pradesh State pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. NAGESWARA RAO BAIPUDI
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
On 03.02.2026, 24.02.2026 & 10.03.2026, there was no representation for the petitioners and the matter has been listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. It shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Date: 24th March, 2026
RKS