Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/5624/2019 of Bhoomi Reddy Kuntolla Krishnaiah, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 23 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 5624/2019 Between: 1. BHOOMI REDDY KUNTOLLA KRISHNAIAH,, S/O
APHC010128282019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 5624/2019
Between:
1. BHOOMI
REDDY
KUNTOLLA
KRISHNAIAH,,
S/O
VENKATA
SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, R/O 10/82, BADVEL ROAD, MYDUKURU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. STATE
OF
ANDHRA
PRADESH,
REP.
BY
ITS
PRINCIPAL
SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT
KADAPA.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MYDUKURU, YSR
KADAPA DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MYDUKURU POLICE STATION, MYDUKURU, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
5. SRI MADDURU SUBBARAYUDU, MYDUKURU VILLAGE AND
MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
6. SRI GANDIKOTA SIVA KUMAR, R/O MYDUKURU VILLAGE AND
MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT.
7. SRI SHAREEF, MYDUKURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, YSR KADAPA
DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 2 to 4 in not providing the police aid to the petitioner, who is facing life threat in the hands of the respondents 5 to 7 and their henchmen, as illegal and violative of Articles 14
and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 2
to 4 to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members IA NO: 1 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 4 to provide police protection to the petitioner, who is facing life threat in the hands of the respondents 5 to 7 and their henchmen, pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. P NARASIMHULU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO.5624 OF 2019
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous.
2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
3. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
Dated: 24.03.2026 TM
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND
WRIT PETITION NO: 5624 of 2019
Dated: 24.03.2026 TM