Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/772/2014 of T.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, CHITTOOR DIST. Vs S. SRINIVASA REDDY, CHITTOOR DIST. on 23 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [2583] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 772/2014 Between: 1. T.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, CHITTOOR DIST., S/O T.MUNI REDDY,
APHC010248102014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 772/2014
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. T.JAYACHANDRA REDDY, CHITTOOR DIST., S/O T.MUNI REDDY, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, (PESTICIDES AND SEEDS) R/O D.NO. 18-2-97, JANATHA BAZAR BUILDINGS, PRAKASAM HIGH ROAD, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. S SRINIVASA REDDY CHITTOOR DIST, S/o Venkata Reddy, Aged about 46 years, Occ: Liquidator, 0/o District Co-op., Audit Office, Liquidator of District Co-op Central Stores Ltd., Chittoor (Janata Bazar), Chittoor, Chittoor District.
...CONTEMNOR Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. T KISTAIAH Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD
The Court made the following ORDER :
The contempt case is filed alleging violation of the order of this Court dated 31.01.2014 passed in C.R.P.M.P.No.357 of 2014.
2. Today, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘likely to be declared as infructuous’, there is no representation on either side.
3. However, the Registry has placed on record, the order passed in C.R.P.No.274 of 2014, whereby the main civil revision petition itself was dismissed as infructuous. Hence, nothing survives for adjudication.
4. Accordingly, the contempt case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 24.03.2026 Dvs
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 772/2014 Dt: 24.03.2026 Dvs