Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/7557/2026 of CHILLARA SEETHA PHANI KRISHNA PRIYA Vs THES STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 22 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.7557 of 2026 Between:

APHC010137662026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

WRIT PETITION No.7557 of 2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. CHILLARA SEETHA PHANI KRISHNA PRIYA, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O.PLOT NO.82, 1st STREET, KAVERI NAGAR, ANDHRAKESARI NAGAR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. PRESENTLY RESIDING AT D.NO.59-1-19A/TB, KASTURI TOWERS, OLD FIVE ROUTE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI,

GUNTUR DISTRICT. - 522237.

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522202

3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT - 524001.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. S DILIP JAYA RAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following:

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA WRIT PETITION No.7557 of 2026

O R D E R: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition stating that the corpus was arrested in connection with a crime that was registered against him in Cyber Crime Police Station, Vijayawada, and that the petitioner as well as the corpus would seek their remedy of bail in the concerned Court.

2. Permission is accorded.

3. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner and the corpus to move for bail in the concerned Court. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, in this case shall stand closed.

________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY

______________________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA Date: 23.03.2026 IBL

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA

WRIT PETITION No.7557 of 2026

Dt: 23.03.2026 IBL

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead