Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/2131/2026 of Pritam Dharmendra Maurya Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 22 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2131/2026 Between: 1. PRITAM DHARMENDRA MAURYA, S/O. DHARMENDRA
APHC010139502026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
1. PRITAM DHARMENDRA MAURYA, S/O. DHARMENDRA SOVARAN
MAURYA,AGED 19 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 170,HARI OM CHAWI, SANTOSH
BHAVAN,NEAR
MAHURA
BALA
VIDYALAYA,NALASOPARA
EAST,
VASAI,
THANE
DISTRICT,MAHARASTRA.
...PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor .Bhimavaram I Town P.S.,West Godavari District.Honble High Court of A.P. Amaravathi
...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS
praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court pleased to allow the present petition and enlarge: ‘the Petitioner/Accused No.1 on bail in Crime No. 194 of 2025 of Bhimavaram I Town Police Station, West Godavari District, registered fqr the alleged offences punishable under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 308(2), 351(4), and 111(2) read with Section 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhjta, 2023, and Sections 66-C and 66- D of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (as amended in 2008), by imposing such terms and conditions as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:
1. BABU RAO PANDIRI
Counsel for the Respondent/complainant:
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Babu Rao Pandiri, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present Criminal Petition with a liberty to file a fresh petition before the concerned Court.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Mrs.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State is in attendance.
4. In that view of the matter, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file a fresh application before the concerned Court.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________________ DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 23.03.2026. UPS
Dt.23.03.2026
UPS