Andhra Pradesh High Court

CRLRC/935/2023 of D.KHADAR MASTAN Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 22 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 935/2023 Between: 1. D.KHADAR MASTAN, S/O

APHC010531352023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

Between:

1. D.KHADAR MASTAN, S/O MADAR SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC.

TEACHER,

RIO

D.NO.58/383-5-18,

TILAKNAGAR,

AKKAYAPALLI, KADAPA DISTRICT

...PETITIONER

AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC

PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

2. SMT D DASTAGIRAMMA KHAIRUNNESA, W/O D. KHADAR

MASTAN, R/O YELLATUR VILLAGE PENDLIMARRI MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT-516216

...RESPONDENT(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. B CHANDRA SHEKHAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

2. A SYAM SUNDAR REDDY

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

JUDGMENT:

The present Criminal Revision Case has been filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C., challenging the Order dated 09.05.2023 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-VI Additional District and Se;ssions Judge, Kadapa in Crl.M.P.No.133 of 2019 in M.C.No.02 of 2008, by enhancing the monthly maintenance @Rs.25,000/- per month to the respondent No.2 herein.

2. Heard Mr.B.Chandrasekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.A.Syam Sundar Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent No.2 and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1-state.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner herein is the husband of the respondent No.2 against whom, a case in Cl.M.P.No.133 of 2019 in M.C.No.02 of 2008 has been filed by the respondent No.2 seeking enhance the monthly maintenance amount from Rs.1,500/- to Rs.25,000/-. He would further submit that the learned Trial Judge without considering the financial constraints and statutory liabilities of the petitioner including his personal expenses, dependent family members and other unavoidable commitments, enhancing the maintenance from Rs.1,500/- to Rs.25,000/- per month to the wife, though she is capable of maintaining herself.

4. Considering the submissions made, on perusal of the material on record and the impugned order, this Court, while exercising its revisional jurisdiction, does not sit as a Court of appeal. The scope of interference under revision is limited and is to be exercised only when there is a patent illegality, material irregularity, or perversity in the order passed by the Trial Court. Unless the findings recorded by the learned Trial Judge suffer from jurisdictional error or are manifestly erroneous, this Court cannot interfere with the order. In the present case, the petitioner/husband, having participated in the trial before the Trial Court, chose not to adduce any evidence in support of his pleadings. On careful perusal of the impugned Order of the learned Trial Court, there are no material irregularities. There is no flagrant miscarriage of justice. No perverse findings. Hence, this criminal revision case is liable to be dismissed.

5. In view of the aforementioned premises, since there are no grounds to entertain revision against the impugned Order, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

Date: 23.03.2026 S D P

Date 23.03.2026 S D P

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead