Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/3444/2025 of T NARASIMHA RAO Vs SRI PIYUSH KUMAR IAS on 22 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3444/2025 Between: 1. T NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED 74 YEARS, R/O.
APHC010615702025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3444/2025
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. T NARASIMHA RAO, S/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED 74 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.20-5-2, NARASIMHA NAGAR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI PIYUSH KUMAR IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF IRRIGATION AND WATER RESOURCES, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. SRI S MOHAN RAO, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
4. SRI R RAVI KIRAN, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KRISHNA CANAL DIVISION, VIJAYAWADA KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, for their wilful disobedience of the order of this Honble Court dated 29.07.2025 passed in W.P. No.
10979 of 2025 and to pass such other order or orders in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMESH BABU TALLURI Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SOMA RAJU YELISETTI
The Court made the following order:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that, the order under contempt is complied with.
In the circumstances, the present contempt case is closed.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
Dt.23.03.2026 SCH
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR
C.C.No.3444 OF 2025 Date: 23.03.2026
SCH