Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/3077/2025 of B SUBBA REDDY Vs K RAMACHANDRA MOHAN on 22 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3077/2025 Between: 1. B SUBBA REDDY, S/O SUBBARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

APHC010541852025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3077/2025

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. B SUBBA REDDY, S/O SUBBARAMI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS,

2. B.GOVINDAMMA, W/O B.SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. BOTH ARE R/O NAYUNIPALLE VILLAGE, VARIKUNTAPAADU POST, S.A. KASINAYANA MANDAL, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S) AND

1. K RAMACHANDRA MOHAN, The Commissioner, Endowment Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Contemnor herein for willfully disobeying the orders of this Honble High Court passed in W.P.No. 14842 of 2025 dt.24-06-2025in such manner and in such a way as this Honble High Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor:

1. NAGARAJU NAGURU The Court made the following Order:

It is stated by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.14842 of 2025, dated 24.06.2025 has been complied with by the respondent.

2. In view of the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 23.03.2026

MSI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3077/2025

Dated: 23.03.2026

MSI

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead