Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/21449/2020 of Kilari Venkateswara Rao, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 22 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 21449 OF Between: 1. KILARI VENKATESWARA RAO, YEARS, OCC BUSINESS R/O. D.NO. 3 STREET, VIJAYAWADA RURAL,
APHC010323702020
IN THE H
(
MONDAY, TH
TWO T
THE HONOURABLE
WRIT P
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. KILARI VENKATESW YEARS, OCC BUSI STREET, VIJAYAWA 521108.
1. THE STATE OF AN SECRETARY, DEPA VELAGAPUDI, AMAR
2. THE DISTRICT C DISTRICT.
3. THE REVENUE DIV DISTRICT.
4. THE IRRIGATION DISTRICT.
5. THE DISTRICT PANC DISTRICT.
6. THE GRAMPANCHAY KRISHNA DISTRICT
7. M/S INDUS TOWERS 8TH FLOOR, SLN TER HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) HE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF MARCH THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT E SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDA PETITION NO: 21449 OF 2020 WARA RAO, S/O NARASIMHA RAO INESS R/O. D.NO. 3-170/3A, KO DA RURAL, ENIKEPADU, KRISHNA D ...PE AND NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P ARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECR RAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM. VISIONAL OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA, OFFICER, ENIKEPADU MANDAL, CHAYAT OFFICER, MACHILIPATNAM, YAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY EN S LIMITED OFFICER AT SURVEY NO RMINUS, GACHIBOWLI HYDERABAD-
AVA AGED 44 ODALIVARI DISTRICT- TITIONER PRINCIPAL RETARIAT, KRISHNA KRISHNA KRISHNA KRISHNA IKEPADU, 133, 4-51 -500032
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. T D PANI KUMAR
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. N SRIHARI (Standing Counsel for ZPP MPP and GRAM PANCHAYAT) The Court made the following order:
Heard Sri K.V.Aditya Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents.
2. The grievance of the petitioner in the instant writ petition is against the action of the respondents in allowing the respondent No.7 to construct the Telecommunication tower pending disposal of the appeal before the 5th respondent-District Panchayat Officer filed against the Erection of telecommunication tower in Sy.Nos.156/1 and 157/1 at Enikepadu Village, Vijayawada Rural and Mandal, Krishna District.
3. Sri T.D.Phani Kumar, learned counsel filed a memo dated 23.01.2026 on behalf of the 7th respondent stating that there is no proposal for erecting the telecommunication tower in the subject property. Thus, the cause in the present writ petition does not survive and no further adjudication is necessary.
4. In view of the said memo, the grievance of the petitioner is resolved. No further orders are required to be passed in the instant case.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Date: 23.03.2026 BSK
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 21449 OF 2020
Date: 23.03.2026 BSK