Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRLP/1392/2026 of Bathini Sri Devi Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh on 22 March 2026
THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA^#i^|^^5j^^ THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL ' TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX :PRESENT: ft 0^' '"3^ -Civ THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA lA No. 1 OF 2026 IN CRLP NO: 1392 OF 2026 Between: Bathini Sri Devi, D/o. Bathini Srisailam,
' /
O'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVA^#i^|^^5j^^
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
:PRESENT:
ft
0^'
'"3^
-Civ
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
lA No. 1 OF 2026
IN
CRLP NO: 1392 OF 2026
Between:
Bathini Sri Devi, D/o. Bathini Srisailam, Aged 32 yrs, R/o.
D.No.
5-136
Kumari
Basthi,
Near
Sai
Baba
Temple,
Narsingi,
Puppalaguda
Rangareddi.
...Petitioner/Accused No.5
(Petitioner in CRLP
on the file of High Court)
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.
...Respondent
(Respondents in-do-)
Counsel for the Petitioner :Sri D PURNACHANDRA REDDY
Counsel for Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Petition
under Section 528
of BNSS
is
filed
praying
that
in
the
circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to list the CrI.P. No. 1392 of 2026 of this Hon'ble Court under the caption 'for being mentioned' and direct the registry to issue the amended order in CrI.P.No. 1392 of 2026 by extending the time to surrender for a period of one week from the date of receipt of the order. Pending disposal of CRLP No.
1392 of 2026, on the file of the High Court.
The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case).
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard Sri D.Purnachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, learned Asst. Public Prosecutor. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the time for furnishing sureties before the concerned court may be extended. Learned Asst. Public Prosecutor would submit that the Court pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, time for furnishing sureties to the satisfaction of the concerned Jurisdictional Court as directed by this Court in the Order dated 23.03.2026 in Crl.P.No.1392 of 2026, is extended for one week from this day. may SD/- G.HELANAIDU DEPUTY registrar SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// F To,
One CC to SRI. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI. PATHURI SRINIVAS Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. [OUT]
4. One spare copy.
HIGH COURT DR.VJP,J DATED: 09/04/2026 POSTED AFTER ONE WEEK FROM THIS DAY
ORDER
I.A.No.1 of 2026 IN CRLP.No.1392 of 2026