Andhra Pradesh High Court
CRP/2992/2024 of POTLURI BAHSKAR MURTHY Vs VEMURI VIJAYA LAKSHMI on 17 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION Between: 1. POTLURI BAHSKAR MURTHY, S/O. JANARDHANA MURTHY, AGED 58 YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 29 SURYARAOPETA, VIJAYAWADA.
APHC010543532024
IN TH
WEDNESDA
TWO
THE HONOURA
CIVIL R
Between:
1. POTLURI BAHSKA
58 YEARS, R/O.
SURYARAOPETA,
1. VEMURI VIJAYA L
VENKATA RAMAIA
DR.VISHNUVARDH
VIJAYAWADA.
2. VEMURI KOTESW
YEARS, R/O. D.NO
SURYARAOPETA,
Petition under Artic
circumstances stated in
pleased topleased to s
I.A.No.254/2024 in O.S.N
andSession Judge, Vij
commissioner to measur
Surveyor and to fix the
basing on the Title Deed
leaving State Highway (
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
AY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MAR
O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL
REVISION PETITION NO: 2992/2024
AR MURTHY, S/O. JANARDHANA MU
D.NO. 29-7-49, VISHNUVARDHAN
VIJAYAWADA.
AND
LAKSHMI, W/O. VEMURIKOTESWAR
AH, AGED 71 YEARS, R/O. D
HAN
RAO
STREET,
SUR
WARA RAO, S/O. VENKATA RAMAI
O.29-7-35/1, DR.VISHNUVARDHAN
VIJAYAWADA.
...RES
le 227 of the Constitution of India,pra
n the grounds filed herein,the High
et-aside the orders dated 28/08/2
No.87/2022 on the file of the XIII Ad
jayawada a consequentially ap
re the suit schedule property with the
boundary stones to the suit the sc
d of the defendants with correct sur
(Vijayawada-Nuziveedu) on the no
RC,J
CRP No.2992 of 2024
DESH
RCH
LAPATI
URTHY, AGED
RAO STREET,
...PETITIONER
RA RAO, S/O.
D.NO.29-7-35/1,
RYARAOPETA,
AH, AGED 79
RAO STREET,
SPONDENT(S):
aying that in the
Court may be
2024 passed in
dditional District
point advocate
e help of Mandal
chedule property
rvey number, by
rthern side and
RC,J
CRP No.2992 of 2024
private road on the southern side, if it exists and grant such other relief or reliefs Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.KILARU NITHIN KRISHNA
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.PILLIX LAW FIRM
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Sri K.S.Murthy, learned senior counsel, sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition to move appropriate application before the trial Court for reentrustment of warrant seeking clarification.
2. Permission accorded.
3. In view of the above, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to the petitioner to move appropriate application before the trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 18TH March, 2026.
RR