Andhra Pradesh High Court
WA/302/2026 of The Depot Manager, Vs Shaik Saibaba, on 17 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT APPEAL NO: 302/2026 Between: 1. THE DEPOT MANAGER,, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE CORPORATION LTD, IMFL DEPOT, NARASARAOPET, PALNADU DISTRICT. 1. SHAIK SAIBABA, S/O SHAIK PEDA BUDE SAHIB, AGED .ABOUT 39
APHC010108422026
IN TH
WEDNESDA
TWO
W
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. THE DEPOT MANA CORPORATION LT DISTRICT.
1. SHAIK SAIBABA, S YEARS,OCC. OUTS VILLAGE, ROMPIC
2. ANDHRA PRADES APSBCL, PROHIBIT MANGALAGIRI, RE
3. GENERAL MANA STATE BEVERAGE PROHIBITION AN MANGALAGIRI.
4. IMFL DEPOT, N BEVERAGES COR DISTRICT. REPR NOS 2 AND 4 NOT
CORAM:- THE HONOUR THE HONOUR E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MAR O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT APPEAL NO: 302/2026 AGER,, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE TD, IMFL DEPOT, NARASARAOPE AND S/O SHAIK PEDA BUDE SAHIB, AGE SOURCING EMPLOYEE, R/O2-48, G CHERLA MANDAL,PALNADU DISTRI SH STATE BEVERAGES CORPO TION AND EXCISE COMPLEX, IHC EP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AGER ADMINISTRATION, ANDHR ES CORPORATION LTD. (APSBCL) ND EXCISES COMPLEX, IHC NARASARAOPET, ANDHRA PRAD RPORATION LTD., NARASARAOPE RESENTED BY ITS MANAGER (RE NECESSARY PARTIES) ...RES RABLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL RABLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYA DESH
RCH E BEVERAGES ET, PALNADU ...APPELLANT ED .ABOUT 39 GOGULAPADU CT. ORATION LTD CORPORATE, RA PRADESH 1ST FLOOR, CORPORATE, DESH STATE ET, PALNADU ESPONDENTS SPONDENT(S): SURYA
W.A No.302 of 2026
Present:- Mr. V.Srinivasula Reddy, Advocate for appellant.
Mr. Sasanka Bhuvanagiri, Advocate for respondent No.1. *** LISA GILL,J.
Prayer in this appeal is for setting aside order dated 09.12.2025 passed by learned Single Bench in W.P No.33443 of 2025, whereby the writ petition has been disposed of while directing respondents therein that is the present appellant to continue with the services of petitioner/respondent No.1 and to ensure that services of petitioner/respondent No.1 are not disturbed. This order has been passed on the basis of submission made by learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4, as recorded in para No.4 of the impugned order dated 09.12.2025.
2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that such a statement was in fact not made by learned counsel, who in effect had denied all allegations in the writ petition.
3. Keeping in view the specific plea raised by learned counsel for appellant as above, when faced with the query whether this aspect had been brought to notice of learned Single Bench, learned counsel for appellant seeks to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file a review application.
4. Writ appeal is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforementioned. In case of an order adverse to the appellant, they are at W.A No.302 of 2026
liberty to avail the remedies as available in accordance with law. No order as to cost. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
(NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE
Date:18.03.2026 MDP