Andhra Pradesh High Court

CC/622/2026 of UNNAM AMRUTHA Vs B. UMA MAHESWARA RAO on 17 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CONTEMPT CASE No: 622/2026 Between: 1. UNNAM AMRUTHA, W/O KISHORE, AGED ABOUT 39, OCC

APHC010065222026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

CONTEMPT CASE No: 622/2026

Between:

1. UNNAM AMRUTHA, W/O KISHORE, AGED ABOUT 39, OCC HOUSE

WIFE

R/O

D.NO

11-61/1A,

YAZALI

VILLAGE,

KARLAPALEMMANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. NOW IN BAPATIA

DISTRICT.

2. UNNAM KISHORE,, S/O NAGESWARARAO, AGED ABOUT 44

YEARS, OCC DAILY WAGER, R/O D.NO 11-61/1A, YAZALI VILLAGE, KARLAPALEMMANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. NOW IN BAPATIA

DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. B UMA MAHESWARA RAO, THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, BAPATLA TOWN AND DISTRICT.

2. SRI GOGONENI RAMANJANEYULU, THE DEPUTY SUPERINTEND

OF POLICE BAPATLA TOWN AND DISTRICT.

3. SRI RAVINDER, THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KARLAPALEM

POLICE STATION, KARLAPALEM MANDAL, BAPATLA DISTRICT.

...CONTEMNOR(S):

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. BHARGAV THIMMARAJU

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

1. A JAYANTHI

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The instant petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 is filed the Petitioner praying to punish the respondents for wilful disobedience of the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.P.No.17048 of 2025 dated 25.07.2025.

2. Heard Sri Bhargav Thimmaraju, learned counsel for the Petitioner and Ms.A.Jayanthi, learned Government Pleader for Home.

3. Learned Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the order dated 25.07.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.17048 of 2025 has been complied with, investigation is completed, charge sheet is also filed before the Court of Additional Junior Civil Judge, Bapatla. Hence, no further orders are required in this matter and the contempt proceedings may be closed.

4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that, recording the same, the case may be closed.

5. Considering the submissions, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:18.03.2026 Dinesh

HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA

C.C.No.622 of 2026

Dt.18.03.2026

Dinesh

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead