Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/16285/2021 of Nakka Satyadevu Vs State of Andhra Pradesh on 17 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 16285/2021 Between: 1. NAKKA SATYADEVU, S/O. LATE JAGANNAYAKULU, AGED ABOUT 54
APHC010278362021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. NAKKA SATYADEVU, S/O. LATE JAGANNAYAKULU, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC. BUILDER R/O. MALAKPET DOOR NO 11-24- 30,HYDERABAD, REPRESENTANT BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, E.TIRUMALA RANI W/O. E.GOPALA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. FLAT NO.E, 3RD FLOOR, KEERTHANA ARCADE, ANAND NAGAR, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
2. SRI.NAKKA UMA MAHESHWARA RAO, S/O. LATE VENKATA RAMANA RAO, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED EMPLOYEE R/O.MARTIN, MARG,DOOR.NO 34-4/E/6, MALLAIKQT BANGLORE REPRESENTANT BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, E.TIRUMALA RANI W/O. E.GOPALA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. FLAT NO.E, 3RD FLOOR, KEERTHANA ARCADE, ANAND NAGAR, MADHURAWADA,
3. NAKKA BALA CHANDRA MUKESHWARA, .S/O. LATE VENKATA RAMANA RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. DIED R/O. RAMNAGAR ,RAMA ARCADE 17,NEAR OLD JAIL ROAD VISHAKAPATNAM REPRESENTANT BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, E.TIRUMALA RANI W/O. E.GOPALA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. FLAT NO.E, 3RD FLOOR, KEERTHANA ARCADE, ANAND NAGAR, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. SMT.SANIWADA JYOTHI PRASAD, W/O. LATE DURGA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, OCC. RETIRED EMPLOYEE R/O.RADHA
RESIDENTIAL FF3,KOMMADI VISHAKAPATNAM REPRESENTANT BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, E.TIRUMALA RANI W/O. E.GOPALA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. FLAT NO.E, 3RD FLOOR, KEERTHANA ARCADE, ANAND NAGAR, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
5. SANIWADA VENKATA RAMANALLATTHY, S/O. BATE-- SA4ANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS R/O.KEERTHANA APARTMENTS P M PALEM VISHAKAPATNAM REPRESENTANT BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, E.TIRUMALA RANI W/O. E.GOPALA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. FLAT NO.E, 3RD FLOOR, KEERTHANA ARCADE,
ANAND NAGAR, MADHURAWADA,
6. MUGANTI VIJAYA LAKSHMI, W/O. SHARATH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. HOSE WIFE R/O. KEERTHANA APARTMENTS P M PALEM VISHAKAPATNAM REPRESENTANT BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, E.TIRUMALA RANI W/O. E.GOPALA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. FLAT NO.E, 3RD FLOOR, KEERTHANA ARCADE, ANAND NAGAR, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
7. KUMARI NAKKA VENKATA VIJAYA PADMINI, D/O. UMA MAHESHWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE R/O. RADLA RESIDENTIAL FF3,KOMMADI VISHAKAPATNAM REPRESENTANT BY THE POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, E.TIRUMALA RANI W/O. E.GOPALA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. FLAT NO.E, 3RD FLOOR, KEERTHANA ARCADE,
ANAND NAGAR, MADHURAWADA,
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR,
VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AT VISAKHAPATNAM.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM DIVISION, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
5. THE INAMS DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, VISAKHAPATNAM RURAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
6. THE SUBREGISTRAR, MADHURAVADA VISHAKAPATNAM DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ in the nature of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction, order or orders declaring the action of the respondents No.2 to 4 in including the land in Sy.No.20/4P admeasuring an extent of Ac.2.82 cents situated in Pothinamallayyapalem Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatham District in the prohibited list as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to delete the land from the prohibited list and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 6th respondent to receive and register the document in respect of the land in Sy.No.20/ 4P admeasuring an extent cif Ac.2.82 cents situated in Pothinamallayyapalem Village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatham District without reference to the inclusion in the prohibited list, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. MANOJ KUMAR BETHAPUDI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
The Court made the following Order:
Sri G. R. Pavan, learned counsel representing Sri Manoj Kumar Bethapudi, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with a liberty to avail remedies under law.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty as prayed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, all pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA Dated: 18-03-2026 MSI
Dated: 18-03-2026 MSI