Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/7334/2019 of Puvvadi Venkataiah, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 17 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7334/2019 Between: 1. PUVVADI VENKATAIAH,, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC-

APHC010169522019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 7334/2019

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. PUVVADI VENKATAIAH,, S/O RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC- AGRICULTURE, RIO MITTAPALLI VILLAGE, GANNEPALLI PANCHAYAT. UDAYAGIRI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

...PETITIONER AND

1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VALAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, ATMAKUR, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

4. THE TAHSILDAR, UDAYAGIRI, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

5. GADAM RATNAMMA, W/O RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT YEARS, OCC- HOUSE WIFE, GANNEPALLI PANCHAYAT, UDAYAGIRI MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction on

JS,J W.P.No.7334/2019

part of the 4th respondent in not conducting any enquiry on the petitioner's representation dated 3-10-2018 and 31-12-2018 to restore the petitioner names in all revenue records including Adangal Pahanies, IB register and Record of Rights for an extent of Ac.2-47 cents respectively covered by Survey Number 186-1, Gannepalli Village, Udayagiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, as illegal, arbitrary, violation of the principles of natural justices and offends Articles 19 and 300 A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to restore the petitioner's name in all revenue records for the petitioner's said lands IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess from the subject lands an extent of Ac2-47 cents respectively covered by Survey Number 186-1, Gannepalli Village, Udayagiri Mandal, SPSR Nellore District, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:

1. P V VENKATA RAVI SANKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

2. K PALLAVI

JS,J W.P.No.7334/2019

The Court made the following ORDER:

The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to the 4th respondent to conduct an enquiry, pass orders on the representations dated 03.10.2018 and 31.12.2018 and consequently to restore the petitioner’s name in the revenue records.

2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the petitioner has not provided sufficient proof that the representation was duly addressed to the respondents. Conversely; the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that acknowledgment material, confirming the submission of the representations, is available on record.

3. This Court observed that the said representations have been pending before the respondent authorities since 2018, given the long pendency, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the matter by directing the respondents to consider and pass orders on the representations made by the petitioner, after giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and the 5th respondent (unofficial respondent) and any other interested parties. Such final orders shall be passed on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of two (2) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4. With these observations and directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

__________________________________

JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 18.03.2026

RSD

JS,J

JS,J

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

WRIT PETITION NO: 7334/2019

Dated: 18.03.2026

RSD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead