Andhra Pradesh High Court
WA/229/2026 of M SRINIVASULU Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 17 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT APPEAL NO: 229/2026 Between: 1. M SRINIVASULU, S/O M. RAMAIAH AGED 58 SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, APSPDCL, HNO 7 88,PADMAVATHIPURAM,NEAR PANCHAYAT OFFICE, TIRUCHANOOR ROAD, TIRUPATI 1. THE STATE OF
APHC010095902026
IN TH
WEDNESDA
TWO
W
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M SRINIVASULU, SUPERINTENDING 88,PADMAVATHIPU TIRUCHANOOR RO
1. THE STATE OF AN TO GOVT., DE VELAGAPUDI,GUN
2. APSPDCL, REP. B 19-13-65/A, SRINIV 517501
3. CH RAMA CHANDR GENERAL MANA SRINIVASAPURAM
4. K SAMPATH KUM MAJOR, OCC CH ANANTHAPUR DIS
CORAM:- THE HONOUR THE HONOUR
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) AY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MAR O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX WRIT APPEAL NO: 229/2026 S/O M. RAMAIAH AGED 58 G ENGINEER, APSPDCL,
URAM,NEAR PANCHAYAT OAD, TIRUPATI AND NDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRI EPARTMENT OF ENERGY, S NTUR. 522237 BY ITS CHARIMAN AND MANAGIN VASAPURAM TIRUCHANOOR ROA RA RAO, S/O AGED ABOUT YEARS AGER, APSPDCL, O/O HNO M, TIRUCHANOOR ROAD, TIRUPATH AR, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIO HIEF GENERAL MANAGER, PU STRICT 515001 ...RES RABLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL RABLE MR. JUSTICE NINALA JAYA DESH
RCH YEARS,OCC HNO
OFFICE, ...APPELLANT . SECRETARY SECRETARIAT, G DIRECTOR, AD TIRUPATI. S, OCC CHIEF
19-13-65/A, HI.517501 ONER, AGED UTTAPARTHY, SPONDENT(S): SURYA
W.A No.229 of 2026
Present:- Mr. M.Solomon Raju, Advocate for appellant.
Mr. Venkata Rama Rao Kota, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Dheera Kanishka, Advocate for respondent No.3.
*** LISA GILL,J.
Challenge in this writ appeal is to order dated 06.02.2026, whereby, writ petition filed by present appellant has been admitted and notice directed to be issued to respondent No.4. Learned counsel for writ petitioner has further been permitted to take out personal notice on respondent No.4 by RPAD and file service in the Registry.
2. Learned counsel for appellant submits that interim relief, as prayed for, by appellant should have been granted by learned Single Bench while admitting the writ petition. Moreover, pending interlocutory applications should also have been adjudicated upon. It is further submitted at this stage that though it was directed that matter be listed after four weeks, the same has still not been listed.
3. Having heard learned counsel for appellant, we do not find any ground to cause any interference at this stage. Arguments, as raised, are clearly the arguments which form subject matter of the writ petition in question, which is admittedly pending. Deliberation upon and decision of all these pleas is within the realm of consideration of learned writ court. Appellant is at liberty to raise all the pleas available to him before the learned Single Bench and is also at liberty to make necessary mention/file appropriate application before the W.A No.229 of 2026
learned Single Bench. We do not find ground for issuance of any direction in this respect at this stage.
4. Writ Appeal is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the appellant to make necessary mention/file appropriate application before learned Single Bench. No order as to cost. There is no expression of any opinion on merits of the matter. Pending application(s), if any, stand(s) disposed of accordingly.
(LISA GILL) JUDGE
(NINALA JAYASURYA) JUDGE
Date: 18.03.2026 MDP