Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/6998/2019 of E.V.Appikondama Charyulu, Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH on 17 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 6998/2019 Between: 1. E.V.APPIKONDAMA CHARYULU,, S/O V. GOVINDA CHARYULU, AGED
APHC010161872019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 6998/2019
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. E.V.APPIKONDAMA CHARYULU,, S/O V. GOVINDA CHARYULU, AGED ABOUT
YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURIST,
R/O BLIEMANNADORAPALEM VILLAGE, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, 'VALAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST
3. THE TAHSILDAR, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus seeking directions to the respondents 2 AND 3 not to dispossess the petitioner from his patta land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.40 cents in Sy.No. 126/3, an extent of Ac. 0.93 cents in Sy.No. 127/P and an extent of Ac. 1.11 cents in Sy.No. 128/1 total Ac. 2.44 cents situated at Bhemannadorapalem Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District
JS, J W.P.No.6998/2019
without following due process of law as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents 2 AND 3 not to disposes the petitioner from his land without following due process of law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents No. 2 & 3 not to disposes the petitioner from his Patta land admeasuring an extent of Ac.0.40 cents in Sy.No. 126/3, an extent of Ac. 0.93 cents in Sy.No. 127/P and an extent of Ac. 1.11 cents in Sy.No. 128/1 total Ac. 2.44 cents situated at Bhemannadorapalem Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N RAVI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
JS, J W.P.No.6998/2019
The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri.B.Surya Chandra, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Since the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 18.03.2026 rsd
JS, J
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 6998/2019
Date: 18.03.2026 rsd