Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/564/2018 of C RANGA REDDY Vs The State of A.P. represented by its Secretary, on 16 March 2026
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 564/2018 Between: 1. C RANGA REDDY, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O APPECHERLA,
APHC010002992018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 564/2018
Between:
1. C
RANGA
REDDY,
OCC.
AGRICULTURE,
R/O
APPECHERLA,
PEDDAVADUGURU
MANDAL,
ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF A P REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, TEMPORARY SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE
DISTRICT
COLLECTOR,
ANANTHAPURAMU
DISTRICT.
3. THE
THAHSHILDAR,
PEDDAVADUGURU
MANDAI,
ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned orders of the 3rd respondent in Rc.No. 127/A/2017 dt. 14.12.2017 as arbitrary, illegal, malafide, violative of the principles of natural justice contrary to the mandatory provisions of A.P. Land Eviction Act, 1905 and the Rules framed there under and Art 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same, direct
the respondents not to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the lands of Appecherla village.
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned orders of the 3rd respondent in Rc.No.127/A/2017 dt. 14.12.2017 pending disposal of the above writ petition.
IA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order granted on 19.01.2018 in IA No. 1 of 2018 in WP No. 564 of 2018.
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KASA JAGANMOHAN REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
The Court made the following
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri C. Narendra, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Sri Kasa Jaganmohan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and the matter has become infructuous.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.
__________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:17.03.2026 DSH