Andhra Pradesh High Court

WP/29966/2025 of MEKALA ANIL VIJAY KUMAR Vs THE UNION OF INDIA on 16 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3207] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND WRIT PETITION NO: 29966/2025 Between: 1. MEKALA ANIL VIJAY KUMAR, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 46 YEARS,

APHC010549662025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

AT AMARAVATI

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3207]

TUESDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO: 29966/2025

Between:

1. MEKALA ANIL VIJAY KUMAR, S/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 46

YEARS, R/O. H. NO. F. NO. 506, GOLDEN FORTUNE APARTMENT, 6TH LANE, BALAJI NAGAR, OPP- ID HOSPITAL ROAD, GORANTIA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

2. MEKALA ANIRUDHA KUMAR, S/O. MEKALA ANIL VIJAY KUMAR, AGED 16 YEARS, R/O. H. NO. F. NO. 506, GOLDEN FORTUNE

APARTMENT, 6TH LANE, BALAJI NAGAR, OPP- ID HOSPITAL

ROAD, GORANTIA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

(BEING MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER WHO IS THE

PETITIONER HEREIN)

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

1. THE UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF EDUCATION, NEW DELHI.

2. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION CBSE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHIKSHA KENDRA, 17, ROUSE AVENUE, NEW DELHI - 110002.

3. THE

REGIONAL

OFFICER,

CBSE

REGIONAL

OFFICE,

VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

4. NEXT GEN SCHOOL NEXT GEN INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, AMARAVATHI ROAD, GUNTUR, ANDHRA PRADESH.

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ/order/direction, declaring the action of the Respondent No. 4 School in not immediately submitted the List of Candidate (LOC) for Petitioner No. 2, Mekala Anirudha Kumar, for the CBSE Class XII Board Examinations, 2025- 26, through the official CBSE portal within time as illegal arbitrary and also oppose to Article 21A of the constitution of India, consequentially direct the respondent no. 4 to submit the LOG of the 2nd petitioner to the respondent upon the same direct the respondents 2 and 3 to accept the LOG submitted by the school for the petitioner and process his application for the board examinations forthwith and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent no.4 to submit the LOC of the 2nd petitioner to the 3rd respondent upon the same direct the respondents 2 and 3 to accept the LOC submitted by the school for the petitioner and process his application for the board examinations forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased Permit the Petitioner No.2 for the examination of 12th Standard C.B.S.E Examination for the academic year 2025-2026 which is scheduled to commence from 18.02.2026 pending disposal the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

1. V SAI KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1. M UMA DEVI (CENTRAL GOVT COUNSEL)

2. T D PANI KUMAR

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO.29966 OF 2025

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that in view of the subsequent developments happened during pendency of this Writ Petition, nothing survives in this Writ Petition for further adjudication and sought to dismiss the Writ Petition as infructuous.

2. Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

3. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this case shall stand closed.

__________________________ JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

Dated: 17.03.2026 TM

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BATTU DEVANAND

WRIT PETITION NO: 29966 of 2025

Dated: 17.03.2026 TM

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead