Andhra Pradesh High Court
WP/30113/2022 of Bekkam Srinivasa Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 15 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 30113/2022 Between: 1. BEKKAM SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O. TIRUPATHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE AND BUSINESS,
APHC010493722022
IN TH
MONDAY
TWO
THE HONOURA
WR
Between:
1. BEKKAM SRINIVAS
YEARS, OCC AG
VILLAGE, NUZVID
2. KATTE RAJESH, ,
OCC TRUCK DRI
KRISHNA DISTRIC
1. THE STATE OF
SECRETARY CIV
VELAGAPUDI, GUN
2. THE COLLECTOR C
3. THE TAHSILDAR, P
4. THE DEPUTY TA
KRISHNA DISTRIC
5. THE STATION H
STATION, PEDANA
6. THE SUBINSPECT
PEDANA MANDAL
PER COURT ORDE
2023.
E HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRAD
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
Y,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH
O THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
ABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMAL
RIT PETITION NO: 30113/2022
SA RAO, , S/O. TIRUPATHAIAH, AG
GRICULTURE AND BUSINESS,
MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT.
S/O.SEETHARAMAIH, AGED ABOU
IVER, R/O.HUSSAINPALEM, MAC
T.
...P
AND
ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY IT
VIL SUPPLIES, SECRETARIAT, AMA
NTUR DISTRICT.
CS, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT KRISHN
PEDANA MANDAL, PEDANA, KRISH
AHSILDAR PDS, PEDANA, PEDA
T.
HOUSE OFFICER, PEDANA POL
A MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
TOR OF POLICE, PEDANA POLI
, KRISHNA DISTRICT. R6 IS IM
ER DT. 25.4.23 VIDE ORDER PASS
...RES
RC,J
DESH
H
LAPATI
GED ABOUT 45
R/O.DIGIMILLI
UT 38 YEARS,
CHILIPATNAM,
PETITIONER(S)
TS PRINCIPAL
ARAVATHI AT
NA.
NA DISTRICT.
ANA MANDAL,
LICE POLICE
CE STATION,
MPLEADED AS
SED IN IA 2 OF
SPONDENT(S):
RC,J
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the mediators report dated 18.8.2022 in seizing the 29.80 quintals of rice containing in 60 bags and Bolero maxi truck bearing No.AP 16 TJ 6107 as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 19, 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions contemplated under the procedure and consequently set aside the same and further direct the respondents to release the seized stock of 29.80 quintals of rice to the 1st petitioner and the Bolero maxi truck bearing No.AP 16 Ti 6107 to the 2'd petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant interim direction directing the respondents to release the seized stock of 29.80 quintals of rice containing in 60 bags to the l' petitioner and the Bolero maxi truck bearing No.AP 16 TJ 6107 to the 2nd petitioner seized under the mediators report dated 18.8.2022 to the petitioner forthwith, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to implead the Proposed respondent as the Respondent No.6 in the writ petition W.P.No. 30113 of 2022 and pass such other order Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1.B V ANJANEYULU
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR HOME
2.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
RC,J
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed questioning the mediators’ report dated 18.08.2022 in seizing the rice as well as Bolero Maxi truck bearing No.AP 16 TJ/6107.
2. Heard Sri B.V.Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Sri Vineeth Appasani, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies.
3. Sri Vineeth Appasani, learned Assistant Government Pleader, in elaboration to the contents of the counter affidavit submitted that in the counter affidavit filed by the Collector (CS), Krishna District, it is stated that in pursuance of the mediators’ report dated 18.08.2022, 6A proceedings were initiated and were concluded ordering confiscation of the seized stock, therefore, nothing remains for adjudication in the writ petition.
4. This writ petition is filed questioning the mediators’ report. The contents of the counter show that 6A proceedings initiated based on the said mediators’ report were concluded ordering confiscation of the seized stock. Hence, nothing remains for adjudication in this writ petition.
5. At this juncture, learned counsel for petitioner, sought liberty to question the confiscation orders.
RC,J
6. In view of the above submissions, this writ petition is closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to question the confiscation orders before appropriate forum. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 16TH March, 2026.
RR