Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1595/2014 of M. Ravi Kumar, Vs Sri B. Rajasekhar, on 12 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1595/2014
APHC010045022014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1595/2014
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. M. RAVI KUMAR,, S/O M. K. RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, OCC: ADVOCATE, R/O CONGRESS OFFICE ROAD, ARUNDALPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
2. MOHAMMED HAYAD,, S/O IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O KRISHNA LANKA VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. SRI B RAJASEKHAR, Commissioner & Inspector General, Registration and Stamps, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 by committing contempt of court by its wilful and deliberate disobedience of the orders dated 2.9.2013 passed in P.I.L. No. 401 of 2013 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. M.V. PRATAP KUMAR
2. U D JAI BHIMA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. V SURYA KIRAN KUMAR
The Court made the following: ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the order of the Court has been complied with by the respondent and requests the Court to close the contempt case.
2. Therefore, recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 13.03.2026 ARR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1595/2014 Date: 13.03.2026
ARR