Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/1382/2018 of Mr J Sreenavasulu Naidu Vs Sri M.Malakondaiah, I.P.S., (Dismissed) on 12 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1382/2018
APHC010433212018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1382/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. MR J SREENAVASULU NAIDU, OCC BUSINESS R/O H.NO 28/3/278 MARUTI NAGAR MYPADU GATE NELLORE-524002
...PETITIONER AND
1. SRI M MALAKONDAIAH I P S DISMISSED, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ANDHRA PRADESH MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. SRI P H D RAMA KRISHNA DISMISSED, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE NELLORE, NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
3. SRI MURALI KRISHNA DISMISSED, STATION HOUSE OFFICER II TOWN POLICE STATION NELLORE NELLORE DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH CONTEMPT CASE IS DISMISSED AGAINST RR 1 TO 3. AS PER COURT ORDER DT.25.02.2026.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to take the cognizance of offence against the respondents for willful disobedience against the order passed this Hon'ble Court passed by the W.A. No. 251 of 2018, dated 22-02-2018 by stating false hood before this Hon'ble Court pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAJENDER KHANNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. The Court made the following: ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
As per the previous order dated 25.02.2026, while dismissing the contempt case against the respondents 1 to 3, it is left open to the petitioner to implead the concerned Officer as party-respondent in the contempt case, who is responsible for placing wrong information before the Division Bench at the time of disposal of the writ appeal. But the petitioner did not take any steps to implead the concerned Officer.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and his counsel is also absent.
3. Therefore, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 13.03.2026 ARR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1382/2018 Date: 13.03.2026
ARR