Andhra Pradesh High Court
CC/2682/2018 of B HARE RAM NAIK Vs Jawahar Reddy on 12 March 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3558] FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2682/2018
APHC010741672018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MARCH
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2682/2018
Between:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. B HARE RAM NAIK, OCC SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER,RWS CIRCLE ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. JAWAHAR REDDY, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. BHARAT NARAYAN GUPTA, ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF, RURAL WATER SUPPLY AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to take cognizance of the Contempt committed by the respondents willful deliberate herein for and not taking necessary steps in accordance with the order of this Hon ble court in Writ Petition No. 10736 of 2018 dated 20-07-2018 and punish them under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 and under Article 215 of the constitution of India and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J SUDHEER Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. G RAJU
The Court made the following: ORDER:- (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Cheekati Manavendranath Roy)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representation of the petitioner as ordered by this Court has been considered, but the same was rejected. So, she submits that the direction of the Court has been complied with and requests the Court to close the contempt case by giving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order of rejecting the representation before the appropriate forum.
2. Therefore, recording the same, the Contempt Case is closed. However, liberty as prayed for is granted. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
________________________________________ JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
_____________________________ JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
Date: 13.03.2026 ARR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TUHIN KUMAR GEDELA
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2682/2018 Date: 13.03.2026
ARR